CNN Nails 0bama on Ayers

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-31-2008
CNN Nails 0bama on Ayers
122
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 3:26pm

Well, I guess CNN does stand for the Clinton News Network..but they did report that 0bama's and Ayers relationship was more than what 0bama has stated.

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-15-2008
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 7:14pm

Your first link shows Obama ahead as of now

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 7:24pm
That's what bothers me, along with that he did that same when it came to his relationship with the Rev. Wright.
NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-19-2003
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 7:27pm

that's where I am stuck too ...


b/c frankly I can't buy that in all those years he never heard a sermon like we saw/heard.

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-10-2008
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 7:36pm

<>


You do realize that the above statement has been taken out of context and used unfairly against both Ayers and Obama?

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-19-2003
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 7:45pm

downplaying the relationship (and no I don't think they were close friends) sets Obama up when the 'truth' comes out and he had to have known it would come out ... he didn't play it smart, at all.

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-10-2008
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 8:10pm

His relationship with Ayers is neither important

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-19-2003
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 8:18pm

His relationship with Ayers is neither important

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-10-2008
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 8:22pm

<<important

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-19-2003
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 8:24pm

ok - then let's replace the word


it's important (it being the relationship) b/c for some unknown reason Obama elected to downplay the relationship.

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-01-2008
Tue, 10-07-2008 - 8:56pm

>>Nope just the left keeps saying that McCain was guilty...when in reality he wasn't. But 3 of the 4 on the left we

All I'm saying is who cares what side they were on? Corruption is corruption. Illegal actions are illegal actions. If all of them were left or Democrat, they'd still be wrong. If all of them were right or Republican, they'd still be wrong.

It seems to me that you are injecting unneccessary partisanship -- beyond McCain v. Obama -- into this debate. I don't understand, but if that's your thing, that's okay.

Laura

Pages