Sure, Barron's is a decent source. But it's composed of a variety of contributors with various views. Finding two economists with diametrically opposing views - in ANY economic climate - to vocally disagree with one another is about as easy as finding snow in Wasilla. The truth - as someone else posted here recently - is that the majority of economists think Obama's plans for the economy, or at least his team's ability to handle it - is superior to McCain's and his team's. That's not to say that EITHER of the two is correct.....only that one view - even from Barron's - doesn't make it written in stone, or absolutely true.
I was kidding. Sopal knows me well enough to understand that, though you may be new enough not to.
However, the fact that I described The Economist as "those commies" ought to have been a clue (that along with the "evil grin" emoticon): I don't think anyone would seriously attempt to label The Economist as "commies." In fact, they are a notoriously fiscally conservative journal.
Pages
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
1) You mean the article that
I was kidding. Sopal knows me well enough to understand that, though you may be new enough not to.
However, the fact that I described The Economist as "those commies" ought to have been a clue (that along with the "evil grin" emoticon): I don't think anyone would seriously attempt to label The Economist as "commies." In fact, they are a notoriously fiscally conservative journal.
Pages