Sarah Palin: GUILTY of Abuse of Power

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-08-2008
Sarah Palin: GUILTY of Abuse of Power
485
Fri, 10-10-2008 - 10:18pm

Sarah did it! The standing Governor of Alaska is found Guilty of Abuse of Power by letting First Dude have so much access to state information, state employees, and making over 19 calls to pressure a state official to fire her BIL out of revenge. It was unlawful, but no charges??

I knew it. She did it as Mayor and got away with it. The McCain camp is making excuses as usual, instead of taking responsibility for her/their actions. Details will be released soon.

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:02am
Todd testified that Sarah had asked him to "drop it". Todd was incensed that a man who tasers children and drives drunk and threatens to kill people was still on duty as a state trooper. How unreasonable of him, huh?
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:05am
I was talking about the part that was RELEASED. The only thing uncomplimentary was the partisan assertion by the ONE POLITICAL HACK investigator that Palin should have been able to somehow keep Todd from talking to Monegan. Pretty pitiful.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:08am
Based on his proven track record...yeah. I'm sure. That is IF he said anything like Mooseburger suggests, which has not been proven.
iVillage Member
Registered: 10-08-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:09am

The members have stated publicly that they do not agree with this ONE man's OPINION.


Could you please post where you got this info.

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:11am

"It's pathetic, for conservatives to actually believe 14 politicians would agree to publishing a report they don't believe is accurate.

NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:12am
Actually I do. I've taken the time to research it using unbiased sources. Obviously you cannot say the same.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:15am
The panel did not agree on the findings by the ONE partisan investigator. They only agreed to release the report. There was only one man investigating this and he is the one who submitted the report to the panel. Some on the panel have spoken openly that they do not agree with his conclusions.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:16am

"I wonder if conservatives even believe the politicians knew what was in the report, much less discussed it. How stupid are they, to think such a thing?!How stupid do they think the politicians are? They have a real knack for twisting and turning the truth, to suit their delusions."


NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
iVillage Member
Registered: 10-20-2007
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:17am
Actually, I can, have, and do.

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 11:21am
They didn't control the committee members they controlled the investigation. There was only ONE MAN who was hired as a "special prosecutor" to conduct the investigation. That one man was a partisan DEMOCRAT hack who was happy to be photographed at Obama headquarters, and was asked to supply an "October Surprise". The committee members did not agree on this mans conclusions and have stated so publicly. They only agreed to release the findings. The findings are now out. Not such a big deal after all.

Pages