Sarah Palin: GUILTY of Abuse of Power

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-08-2008
Sarah Palin: GUILTY of Abuse of Power
485
Fri, 10-10-2008 - 10:18pm

Sarah did it! The standing Governor of Alaska is found Guilty of Abuse of Power by letting First Dude have so much access to state information, state employees, and making over 19 calls to pressure a state official to fire her BIL out of revenge. It was unlawful, but no charges??

I knew it. She did it as Mayor and got away with it. The McCain camp is making excuses as usual, instead of taking responsibility for her/their actions. Details will be released soon.

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 3:51pm
I am not saying that Mr. Palin didn't overstep bounds, and didn't place undo pressure.
NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 3:56pm
" Were you trying to post to Alicia? I think you goofed.

Go Sahasranama! LOL! "


If that poster is posting to me, I won't see it.




NIU Ribbon
NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 3:58pm
LOL, That's what I've been thinking, but hesitating to say.
NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-20-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 4:00pm

"I am not saying that Mr. Palin didn't overstep bounds, and didn't place undo pressure. That is what the report said."

Yes, you betcha you are right. That's what it said, and you are smart not to argue it didn't happen. It happened. It was her husband who acted as her tool, and when there was resistance she dropped the hammer. The two of them obviously operate closely. Todd is her strong man.

It's bad. Real bad considering how little else we know about Palin and how little time there is to discover and assess.

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-10-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 4:10pm
They thought it was "objective" to convict Palin BEFORE the investigation.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 4:13pm
Of course! What was I thinking?
iVillage Member
Registered: 10-08-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 4:13pm

If you are sincerely interested in looking at this objectively, you may want to see Palin's lawyer's response to this. If you will agree to read it (it's a quick read) I would be happy to discuss this with you further.


Chilly, you can't use the word objective in talking about what Palin's LAWYER had to say.

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-08-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 4:14pm

I already listened to her lawyer and her continued denial of doing anything wrong.

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 4:21pm

I'm not talking about the lawyer being objective, I'm talking about YOU being objective. Listening to only one partisan side is not being objective.

They did not release all of the testimony. Without all of it, you are left with nothing more than what Branchflower wants you to see. That is a form of propaganda called "stacking the deck". Look it up.

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sun, 10-12-2008 - 4:26pm
It seems to me that you have and objection for others to see both sides. Am I correct?

Pages