Sarah Palin: GUILTY of Abuse of Power

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-08-2008
Sarah Palin: GUILTY of Abuse of Power
485
Fri, 10-10-2008 - 10:18pm

Sarah did it! The standing Governor of Alaska is found Guilty of Abuse of Power by letting First Dude have so much access to state information, state employees, and making over 19 calls to pressure a state official to fire her BIL out of revenge. It was unlawful, but no charges??

I knew it. She did it as Mayor and got away with it. The McCain camp is making excuses as usual, instead of taking responsibility for her/their actions. Details will be released soon.

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-12-2007
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:09am

Nope.

   

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-08-2008
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:16am

Please, please, try coming to gripes with this

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-20-2007
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:17am

It was an official bipartican state investigation.

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-12-2007
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:19am

No not so simple.

   

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:19am

Actually the two DEMOCRAT OBAMA SUPPORTER Leaders of the investigation CONTROLLED the investigation. There was only ONE Democrat hack hired by another Democrat Hack to do the investigation. One was quoted as saying that they moved up the deadlines of the investigation so that they could supply an OCTOBER SURPRISE. They controlled the subpoenas, and only interviewed 19 people. And all they ended up producing were headlines.

The actual findings of the report say that A group of political enemies announced that Governor Palin broke no laws but did things they didn’t like. Much ado about nothing.




Edited 10/11/2008 6:14 pm ET by chillychillychilly
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:23am

Maybe you should check your constitution. Until there is a trial, you are innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

The panel was led by DEMOCRAT OBAMA SUPPORTERS who hired a Democrat Hack to investigate this. It was a political witch hunt that produced nothing but headlines. That's it.




Edited 10/11/2008 5:02 pm ET by chillychillychilly
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-29-2008
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:25am
I really don't think it's going to work for them, and will probably backfire. I think most reasonable people would be turned off by someone who tasers 10 year old children.
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:32am
Could you define how she abused her power?
NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2003
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:38am

Yep, I would love to know why a man that admittedly tasers her 10 y/o stepson with his police taser is still working?

NIU Ribbon   Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
iVillage Member
Registered: 10-08-2008
Sat, 10-11-2008 - 11:43am

False.

There are two issues at stake here, which is why, although the panel found her unquestionably guilty of abuse of power, no criminal charges or sanctions are being filed. The question for which possible criminal charges or sanctions would have been meted out was for her treatment (the firing) of Walt Monegan. The panel concluded that Palin was within her authority to fire Monegan, under the laws of the State of Alaska. The SECOND issue, and the one over which the panel returned their judgment of abuse of power, has to do not with the firing of Monegan, but the PRESSURING of Monegan to fire Wooten. That is a "violation of the public trust," according to Alaska law, as well. Hence the judgment.

The point here is that after exhaustive investigation by a panel comprised of ten GoOPers and four Democrats (who voted unanimously to proceed with this investigation, and again unanimously to release the findings), the results are that Sarah Palin abused the authority of her office to pressure a state employee in ways which are a violation of public trust.

After eight years of Big Dick Cheney abusing power as Veep - the very job for which Palin is asking the voters of America to choose her - do we really need another secretive, subpoena-ignoring, powermad wacko in that office?

I think not. Time for some ImPalin.

Pages