Sarah Palin: GUILTY of Abuse of Power
Find a Conversation
Sarah Palin: GUILTY of Abuse of Power
| Fri, 10-10-2008 - 10:18pm |
Sarah did it! The standing Governor of Alaska is found Guilty of Abuse of Power by letting First Dude have so much access to state information, state employees, and making over 19 calls to pressure a state official to fire her BIL out of revenge. It was unlawful, but no charges??
I knew it. She did it as Mayor and got away with it. The McCain camp is making excuses as usual, instead of taking responsibility for her/their actions. Details will be released soon.


Pages
Yep. Send for the WAAAAAAHmbulance. There's a lot of GoOPers here in critical condition.
>>The point here is that after exhaustive investigation by a panel comprised of ten GoOPers and four Democrats (who voted unanimously to proceed with this investigation, and again unanimously to release the findings), the results are that Sarah Palin abused the authority of her office to pressure a state employee in ways which are a violation of public trust.
Wrong, wrong and wrong.
Probably no more proof than you do for THIS statement: "Todd Palin did nothing wrong, and neither did Gov. Palin."
Unless you were there and/or served on that panel the only "proof" you have is something you intrepreted from something you read...
ok... let's reverse this...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska - Sarah Palin "abused her power" as governor in the disciplinary case against a state trooper, according to a legislative panel's report released Friday, though it also found that her firing of a state commissioner was "proper and lawful."
Now... THERE'S the real story...
You can't make her as pure as the white snow just by highlighting things YOU want to believe. Fact: She abused her power as a Governor. Fact: the firing of a state commissioner was "proper and lawful" - Two different issues...
They didn't vote unanimously to release the findings.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/
"After a court fight to block the report failed, the panel of lawmakers voted to release it — though not without dissension. The panel did not vote on whether to endorse its findings."
It appears the HACKS had control - just as I said.
"Can't be found guilty of something you haven't been tried for."
I can't believe Ijust read that!
So... that means that none of the candidates are "guilty" of lying simply because they haven't been tried (in court)?
You can't have it both ways you know...
I am just stating what the report ACTUALLY says, not what you are reading into the findings.
And, again, the vote was NOT unanimous. It was a political hack job, nothing more.
Here's a story from MSNBC, hardly a conservative source for info:
"After a court fight to block the report failed, the panel of lawmakers voted to release it — though not without dissension. The panel did not vote on whether to endorse its findings."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27105917/
Pages