How do they know that no "voter fraud" wasn't committed? Just guessing? LOL! Only the most egregious registrations were ever investigated. Right now, there are 200K red flagged registrations in Ohio alone that are going unchecked. If the "fraudulent" registrations aren't caught, how would anyone know that a false vote was cast under these names? They won't investigate the known suspicious ones...they sure aren't going to investigate ones that aren't screaming "Mickey Mouse."
We know that voter registration fraud won't necessarily lead to voter fraud, but what has been unmentioned is that registration fraud is perpetrated by more that just ACORN:
Mark Jacoby, who owns a firm hired by the California Republican Party, violated state laws with his own registration, authorities say.
By Evan Halper, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer October 20, 2008
SACRAMENTO -- The owner of a firm that the California Republican Party hired to register tens of thousands of voters this year was arrested in Ontario over the weekend on suspicion of voter registration fraud.>>>full article at the link above
Sorry, but the math doesn't add up. ACORN has been at this for quite a while now. Supposedly they get paid because they have a...*cough*...reputation for pulling in high new voter registration. In PA there's already evidence that around 20% of their registrations are bogus...in Ohio it's around 30%...these are KNOWN frauds. No one cares if registration is high if the folks that registered don't vote. So it stands to reason that no one would hire ACORN to "get out the vote" if they provided a significant number of registrations that don't result in votes...i.e. someone must be voting.
Query...ACORN claims to have registered 1.3 million new voters...has any checked to see if there are around 1.3 million new Democrat votes cast attributable to the ACORN efforts? If ACORN can't demonstrate a positive effect, then why would anyone hire them? Hmmm...
>>> What are the chances of a fraudulent registration then matching up with somebody who shows up at a precinct to vote? That is what the CNN report says makes the whole matter overplayed by the Republicans.
That doesn't make any sense. The chances of voter fraud are incredibly high. No ID is required in 26 states and easily falsified ID is required in 17 more...not to mention early voting in some states and absentee ballots. Those other methods aside, all anyone has to do is walk up with the "phony registered name" and cast their vote. Who would know?
Pages
Yes, CNN did a factcheck on claims about ACORN:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8yVkU5vabE
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
I posted a video - it will likely explain how those registration forms won't necessarily turn into actual people showing up at the polls to vote.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8yVkU5vabE
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
We know that voter registration fraud won't necessarily lead to voter fraud, but what has been unmentioned is that registration fraud is perpetrated by more that just ACORN:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-fraud20-2008oct20,0,3842357.story
<<
October 20, 2008
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
Sorry, but the math doesn't add up. ACORN has been at this for quite a while now. Supposedly they get paid because they have a...*cough*...reputation for pulling in high new voter registration. In PA there's already evidence that around 20% of their registrations are bogus...in Ohio it's around 30%...these are KNOWN frauds. No one cares if registration is high if the folks that registered don't vote. So it stands to reason that no one would hire ACORN to "get out the vote" if they provided a significant number of registrations that don't result in votes...i.e. someone must be voting.
Query...ACORN claims to have registered 1.3 million new voters...has any checked to see if there are around 1.3 million new Democrat votes cast attributable to the ACORN efforts? If ACORN can't demonstrate a positive effect, then why would anyone hire them? Hmmm...
Nope...sorry, but it doesn't add up.
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
>>> What are the chances of a fraudulent registration then matching up with somebody who shows up at a precinct to vote? That is what the CNN report says makes the whole matter overplayed by the Republicans.
That doesn't make any sense. The chances of voter fraud are incredibly high. No ID is required in 26 states and easily falsified ID is required in 17 more...not to mention early voting in some states and absentee ballots. Those other methods aside, all anyone has to do is walk up with the "phony registered name" and cast their vote. Who would know?
I'm guessing you've voted before in your life, doc, right?
Are you forgetting about absentee ballots and voting by mail?
Pages