PALIN:Friday Deposition For Troopergate

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-08-2008
PALIN:Friday Deposition For Troopergate
33
Thu, 10-23-2008 - 1:49am
Okay, Sarah's "official" Troopergate investigation begins????? She's delusional. Sarah is guilty, why does she want to be punished for it, too? Is she a masochist? lol. Or did she cut a deal with the board doing the investigation?
Gov. Palin to give Troopergate deposition Friday

by Rachel D'Oro - Oct. 21, 2008 03:17 PM
Associated Press


http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/president/articles/2008/10/21/20081021palin1021trooper.html


iVillage Member
Registered: 10-12-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 8:53pm
No I am not confused.

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-23-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 8:58pm

Just as you were not truly under the impression that Palin had been undergoing criminal trial in a court of law regarding this matter, I doubt anyone else here was under that impression, either.

Nevertheless, I will repeat - again - that, according to an investigator who was hired to investigate the matter, Sarah Palin abused her power as governor, in violation of the statute listed. Branchflower's final report gives the specific statute, for crying out loud.


Konichiwa, Bitches!
McCain LOST???

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-12-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 9:03pm
Boy that is a fast change from **Apparently, a little remedial reading comprehension study might be in order for some of us who "read the report":** now isn't it?

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-23-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 9:20pm

Backpedaling?

I have not mentioned the words "guilty" or "charge(d)" in this thread, ever. Go on, I don't expect you to believe me. But if you scroll backward through it, you will discover that it is nonetheless true. I'm quite aware of the differences, which is why I suggested you might need some remedial brush-up on the report, if you think that Palin was not found to have violated an Alaska state statute.


Konichiwa, Bitches!
McCain LOST???

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-12-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 9:26pm
No you just defended on that did say such a thing, and told me that remedial reading should be done.

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-08-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 9:38pm

((((I didn't say she wasn't found to have violated the statute.))))


iVillage Member
Registered: 10-12-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 9:43pm

This was not a court of law.

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-23-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 9:44pm

No, it appears that melanie would like "guilty" to mean ONLY "convicted of a crime in a court of law."

So, for example, if you tell your spouse that the family dog has "a guilty look" on his face, and you're wondering if he got into the treat box again, what you're really saying is "honey, the dog has the appearance of someone who's been convicted in a court of law by a jury of his peers."





Konichiwa, Bitches!
McCain LOST???

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-08-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 9:59pm

So, why does Palin need an attorney, Thomas Van Flein,

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-12-2008
Fri, 10-24-2008 - 10:03pm
Because she is campaigning and needs someone to represent herself.