This Famewhore is such a TWIT
Find a Conversation
This Famewhore is such a TWIT
| Fri, 10-24-2008 - 6:33pm |
Elisabeth Hasselbeck is really nauseating.
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=6105085
I don't expect The View ladies to be experts, but given the stakes if we attack another country (like Pakistan, which has nuclear weapons) and since the ladies routinely spout off nonsense about U.S. foreign policy, I think it would behoove them to read some sites like antiwar.com, which routinely has experts talk about the true dangers out there vs the ones only in

Pages
Since you were so offended, it makes no sense for you (or others similarly offended) to even click on the thread, and to continue to come back and make comments.
Sure it does. This site might be a political board, but it exists on what is primarily a website for women. All are welcome, but I would think there would be some underlying element of respect for women, and not call out people as whores and twits and such - or toss around words like 'hysteria.' (For the record, that isn't in this thread, but has made its way here in the past at times.)
Why is it necessary to title a thread in this way? Does it add to the discussion? I would think not, given the larger body of responses are pro and con to my tangential commentary.
http://llhaesa.org/
Full length fiction: worlds undone
"You have no power over my body..." ~ Anne Hutchinson
Perhaps if you wanted people to focus in on your topic, and not the hatred being thrown around during this election cycle, you shouldn't have posted a title that obviously offended several people, on both sides of the spectrum.
and, by the way, i did not hijack your thread. my hillary comment was responding to another poster.
topic police alert
http://llhaesa.org/
Full length fiction: worlds undone
"You have no power over my body..." ~ Anne Hutchinson
Pages