Exactly the same isn't true. But certainly the claim is partically true -- and many of McCain's policies ARE the same as Bushs (no surprise they belong to the same political party, they SHOULD have similar policies).
But Obama isn't partly Muslim -- that is a complete and total falsehood
In both cases the purpose is to frighten people into moving away from the candidate, but the statements aren't equivalent.
I don't like Bush. I never did. But I agree with the Republican platform.
You think that Obama will not get involved in wars? You are kidding right? Wars have been part of the worlds history, wars will be part of the worlds future.
Pages
"At the end of the day, the
Exactly the same isn't true. But certainly the claim is partically true -- and many of McCain's policies ARE the same as Bushs (no surprise they belong to the same political party, they SHOULD have similar policies).
But Obama isn't partly Muslim -- that is a complete and total falsehood
In both cases the purpose is to frighten people into moving away from the candidate, but the statements aren't equivalent.
but the statements aren't equivalent.
in terms of purpose .. spin/evade/frighten based on misleading they are equivalent.
Yes I disagree to a certain extent. One misleads the other lies. Not equivalent.
One preys on an irrational fear of terrorists by lying about a candidate.
One takes an association that actually (and rightfully) exists and exaggerates it.
I don't like Bush. I never did. But I agree with the Republican platform.
You think that Obama will not get involved in wars? You are kidding right? Wars have been part of the worlds history, wars will be part of the worlds future.
Pre-emptive war - how about responding to what was believed to be an additional terrorist threat.
Pages