OP-ed: The Election Choice: Education

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-17-2008
OP-ed: The Election Choice: Education
43
Thu, 10-30-2008 - 5:12am
CODE=STATISTIC SYMBOL=FREE
CODE=SUBJECT SYMBOL=OPIN
-->
The Election Choice: Education
Obama says schools need more money, McCain wants more accountability.



  • Though education has not figured prominently in the campaign, John McCain and Barack Obama have their proposals. Each falls squarely within their respective party's established political framework: Boiled down, Mr. Obama believes that schools require more resources and federal support, while Mr. McCain wants to introduce to the education system more choice and accountability.






School choice. Mr. McCain would pursue education reforms that institute equality of choice in the K-12 system. He would allow parents whose kids are locked into failing public schools to opt out, whether in favor of another public school, a charter school or through voucher or scholarship programs for private options. Parents, he believes, ought to have more control over their education dollars. Teachers' unions and school administrators find none of this amenable.

Mr. McCain supports merit pay for teachers and would establish a bonus program for high-performing educators, as well as devote more funds toward attracting successful college graduates into the field. He would also give principals more control over their schools, including spending decisions, instead of district school boards.


Teachers. Mr. Obama prefers that students stay within the current system, though he acknowledges its many problems. A mainstay of his campaign is his promise to completely underwrite training costs in teacher preparation. He also supports continuing education and mentoring programs for current teachers. So that there is a "guarantee of quality," he backs mandatory professional accrediting for educators and proposes a "career ladder initiative" to reform teacher compensation and tenure to recognize expertise. During a recent speech to the American Federation of Teachers, Mr. Obama disparaged "tired rhetoric about vouchers and school choice."


No Child Left Behind. The 2001 legislation that introduced national performance standards and accountability to the schools remains a political live wire, particularly in regard to weak enforcement by the Department of Education. Mr. McCain has offered few specific reforms but generally supports the law's broad contours as a good start. Many of Mr. Obama's reform ideas would result in essentially suspending the law's accountability provisions, though not the Washington funding, which he says he would increase.


Early childhood education. Mr. Obama supports a universal preschool policy and says that his "zero-to-five" early education agenda "begins at birth." He would increase federal outlays for universal preschool education by $10 billion annually, handing the states block grants devoted to infants and toddlers. Mr. Obama also wants to expand eligibility for Head Start, the four-decade-old federal preschool program for low-income kids.


Mr. McCain believes there is already a profusion of federal programs devoted to early child care and preschool, including Head Start and its many offshoots. He would try to better coordinate the programs and focus them on outcomes to reduce waste. To reward success, Mr. McCain wants to establish "centers of excellence," which would receive more Head Start funding and serve as models for underperforming institutions.


Public service. Though both candidates call on listeners to devote themselves to "causes greater than self-interest," Mr. Obama would see to it that they do, with a plan for "universal voluntary citizen service." In addition to doubling the size of the Peace Corps, he would create a Classroom Corps, a Health Corps, a Homeland Security Corps and a Clean Energy Corps, plus a Green Jobs Corps. Mr. Obama proposes a fully refundable tax credit of $4,000 for college students who complete 100 hours of community service a year ($40 an hour). He would make federal education aid conditional on high schools requiring students to perform 50 hours of service a year.


Higher education. Mr. Obama suggests expanding federal student aid programs, including Pell Grants, and says he will streamline college tax benefits, which are so complicated many students and families don't end up claiming them. Mr. McCain likes the tax simplification part. He also believes that earmarks have compromised the integrity of government-financed research at the nation's universities and promises to eliminate them (the earmarks, not the universities).


-- By Joseph Rago


http://online.wsj.com/article

 

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 02-19-2008
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 11:12am
Not really relevant to the discussion. Try again.
mccain image

Obama image
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 11:17am

The vouchers would also be a federal mandate, so what is the difference from a constitutional POV. IMO, NCLB is already way over those bounds, btw.

Opening up public schools would not require vouchers.

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-30-2008
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 11:19am
Hey you asked the question and I answered it.
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 11:19am
Yes, for free, paid for with taxes. You pay the taxes whether you have kids or not and your kids go for free whether you pay tax or not.
iVillage Member
Registered: 02-19-2008
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 11:24am

Remember, states can always refuse Federal money and thus free themselves from compliance with NCLB. A school could always refuse vouchers if they didn't want government involvement.

Regarding opening up public schools, I do not believe at present it is a matter for the Federal government.

mccain image

Obama image
iVillage Member
Registered: 02-19-2008
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 11:28am

"Yes, for free, paid for with taxes."

That's an oxymoron.

mccain image

Obama image
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 11:29am
You may not think so, but it is no different from the other two initiatives. In fact, if anything it could be argued that it is the least invasive of the three.
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 11:31am
No, not really.
iVillage Member
Registered: 02-19-2008
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 2:52pm
Regardless of what I may think about it I don't believe the Federal government has the power to do it. Though the entertainment value of watching it would be priceless.
mccain image

Obama image
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-26-2003
Fri, 10-31-2008 - 3:00pm
And I am saying that if the fed has the power to mandate vouchers, it can mandate free public choice just as well.