And you will nominate people with absolutely no command of the English language. At least our nominee graduated at the top of his class in law school, as opposed to the bottom. Yep, we have intellectual standards. Do you?
>>President Bush would have not qualified to be the DEMOCRATS nominee for president, since THE DEMOCRATS' only qualifications are good speaking skills and charisma.<<
Can you name some other positive qualities of his? I didn't vote for him 2X and still can't figure out what 1/2 our country saw in him.
Naw.....not unless you're willing to stipulate that you'll nominate anyone who sings that they want to "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb-bomb Iran." If you agree to that, then I will agree that "we" will "nominate anyone who speaks well."
Pages
Edited 11/2/2008 2:11 pm ET by chillychillychilly
Chilly...I have to correct you here.
Yes, those 143 days in the Senate really make him qualified.
Even more shocking about Byrd - during the primaries he endorsed Obama.
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
I just keep swatting those fruit flies but they will not go away!
Anyway, what were you saying? I couldn't hear because of those darned fruit flies buzzing in my ears.
>>President Bush would have not qualified to be the DEMOCRATS nominee for president, since THE DEMOCRATS' only qualifications are good speaking skills and charisma.<<
Can you name some other positive qualities of his? I didn't vote for him 2X and still can't figure out what 1/2 our country saw in him.
Naw.....not unless you're willing to stipulate that you'll nominate anyone who sings that they want to "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb-bomb Iran." If you agree to that, then I will agree that "we" will "nominate anyone who speaks well."
What, no deal?
McCain LOST???
Pages