Troopergate Verdict-Palin did NO WRONG
Find a Conversation
Troopergate Verdict-Palin did NO WRONG
| Mon, 11-03-2008 - 7:56pm |
An independent review of the case (read that no political axes to grind) has found that Sarah Palin did NOT violate any ethics laws or any other laws in the case involving her brother in law and the firing of the Public Service Commissioner.
I'd say I hate to say I told you so, but I don't.

Pages
Oh, I do have pretty strong negative feelings about her qualifications for VP, but I don't hate her.
~mark~
"You seem to carry a lot of hate for this woman."
Oh please. Why make this personal? She never should have been picked. McCain never vetted her and picked her as a last minute bone to the ultra-right-wing after they vetoed his first choice of Lieberman. McCain interviewed her a grand total of one times. Even Micky D's interviews its burger flippers 3 times.
And speaking of hate - did you catch this latest stunt Palin pulled:
"With time running out, Sarah Palin has delivered what might be the most incendiary line of the entire presidential campaign.
Not content to just disagree with her opponents on policy, the Republican vice presidential nominee has accused Democrats of outright sympathizing with terrorists.
"What do they think? Do they think the terrorists have all the sudden become the good guys and changed their minds?" she asked a crowd in Jefferson City, Mo. "No, the terrorists still seek to destroy America and her allies and all that it is that we stand for: freedom, tolerance, and equality. The terrorists have not changed their minds."
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Palin_Do_Dems_think_terrorists_are_1103.html
If only Republicans like Palin walked the walk instead of just talking the talk. Republicans deregulated us into the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. Republicans diverted us from killing our real enemy in al Qaeda - instead Republicans led us into a war in Iraq for reasons that turned out to be 100% wrong. It's time for a change. We can't keep rewarding Republicans with our votes. Show them that they need to improve before they can come back.
Fair enough, we might have been arguing around each other there for a while.
Didn't break any ethics laws you mean.
Sure is a merry-go-round since some on here refuse to see the break-point between a question of personal ethics and a question of law.
~mark~
Pages