I HIGHLY doubt that. In fact, I'd bet most people would see it as a very sensible move and most would be GLAD that a trusted member of a family would be able to look after the children (even more so, the greater the number of children particularly if one had special needs).
Seriously, It's sort of weird arguing all these mythical "what if" scenarios.
While I agreed with what dablacksox said, I understood that it was only PART of the right wing (the one that is a concern)....Any sensible human being shouldn't have an issue with this (and in fact, would look upon it as a GOOD thing).
Pages
I HIGHLY doubt that. In fact, I'd bet most people would see it as a very sensible move and most would be GLAD that a trusted member of a family would be able to look after the children (even more so, the greater the number of children particularly if one had special needs).
Seriously, It's sort of weird arguing all these mythical "what if" scenarios.
Michelle Obama's father is dead.
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02360.pdf
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
did you post this to the wrong person?
I've said time and time again I think grandma is a wise choice
<
Absolutely disgusting.>>
It makes the title of this thread "double standard" particularly meaningful....But probably not in the way the OP intended it.
Edited 11/14/2008 12:17 pm ET by suemox
Okay, I don't necessarily think there was anything particularly wrong or definitely not anything unethical about it.
I still don't understand....What exactly IS the issue?
<>
No it hasn't happened many times over the years.
While I agreed with what dablacksox said, I understood that it was only PART of the right wing (the one that is a concern)....Any sensible human being shouldn't have an issue with this (and in fact, would look upon it as a GOOD thing).
Pages