BREAKING..BC suit makes it to C. Thomas
Find a Conversation
| Tue, 11-18-2008 - 11:20am |
.
The application to renew the suit to force Obama to produce his accurate, original birth certificate has now been sent to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Remember Obama trashed Clarence Thomas during the presidential debate.
Poetic justice?
.
On Friday Nov. 14, 2008, Leo C. Donofrio sent, by US Postal Express Mail, a letter, as required by Supreme Court Rule 22.4,
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalbornc...V.+17+-+LETTER
to the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court -- William K. Suter -- requesting his Emergency Stay Application
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalbornc...+SUPREME+COURT
as to the national election by renewed to the Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas by right of law, specifically Supreme Court Rule 22.4.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/22.html
As of 1:17 PM the renewed application has not been updated to the US Supreme Court automated Docket.
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm
According to Supreme Court Rule 22.1 http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/22.html
the Clerk is demanded to "transmit it promptly" to the Justice it is addressed to. Please recall that on Nov. 3rd, Donofrio originally submitted this same emergency stay application to the US Supreme Court. Despite the stay, the Clerk -- Mr. Danny Bickell -- made assurance that the application would be given to the Honorable Associate Justice David Souter that night, it was not transmitted promptly. In fact, it was not transmitted at all after Mr. Bickell, having made an illegal and improper substantive judgment of law, thereby denied the application on his own volition.
The emergency stay application was eventually submitted to the Honorable Associate Justice David Souter, four days late, on November 6, after Mr. Bickell was forced to concede that his denial had been improper.
The emergency stay application, having been brought to the US Supreme Court from a denial of the New Jersey Supreme Court, was required by Supreme Court Rule 22.3
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/22.html
to be submitted to Justice Souter as he is the Justice assigned to the Third Circuit which includes New Jersey. The application was denied by Justice Souter on Nov. 6, and such denial therefore triggered the legal right, under Rule 22.4
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/22.html
to renew the emergency stay application to "any other Justice." The application to renew has now been sent to the Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas.
Hopefully, this time, the emergency stay application will be promptly transmitted to the Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas.
The renewed application was delivered to the US Supreme Court Clerk's office at exactly 7:46 AM by US Postal Express Mail.
http://www.blogtext.org/albums/natur...izen/18719.JPG
(Click link for US Postal proof of delivery.)
Tons of documentation at this site.
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
And, here is the .pdf file of Ambassador Alan Keyes, et al, lawsuit in California.
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/AlanKeyesSuit.pdf
Andy Martin's, lawsuit goes before the judge today in Hawaii.
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/20...vember-18-2008
The defendants in this case are Linda Lingle, the Governor of Hawaii, and Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health .
The statement of claim:
1. Plaintiff requested a certified copy of the birth certificate of Senator Obama from the Department of Health and tendered the requisite fee.
2. Defendants refused to provide a copy of said certificate, invoking the confidentiality statutes of the State.
3. The issue of the Senator’s birth certificate has become a controversial topic of intense national speculation.
4. As an author who strives for factual accuracy and attempts to conduct thorough research Plaintiff wants a copy of the Senator’s birth certificate attested to by the State and not a “certificate” which is posted on a web site and which has been debunked as possibly having been altered.
5. One of the more literate and temperate analyses of the unlawfulness of the Defendants’ refusal to issue certified copies of the birth certificate is contained in Exhibit 1 attached hereto.
6. To the extent that the Defendants’ files contain or retain original supporting data for the birth certificate, Plaintiff asks that he also be supplied with that information and/or material as well.
7. It is axiomatic that the birth certificate of a presidential candidate is a document of crucial public concern and significance.
8. While Hawai’i statutes call for a balancing or weighing test where production is considered by a court, most respectfully Plaintiff submits that the balance falls entirely on the side of disclosure where the original birth certificate of a presidential candidate is concerned.
.
Divided Loyalties, Obama’s Eligibility Problem
By Judah Benjamin, Guest Author
FOREWORD by TexasDarlin
Judah Benjamin, an historian and former journalist, has written a two-part series challenging the Constitutionality of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President. It is exhaustively researched, and lengthy compared to most blog entries. However, I have left his story in tact with only minor edits because of its importance.
Although Judah Benjamin addresses the possibility that Obama was born in foreign territory, the article’s central thesis rests on the assumption that Obama was born in the United States.
Here is my 2-sentence bottom-line summation:
Barack Obama has been a citizen of multiple nations. And even if his citizenship outside the US was renounced, Article II of the U.S. Constitution prohibits him from being President, for the same reason that naturalized citizens are prohibited: divided loyalties.
The article must be read in its entirety to be fully understood and appreciated. It will be presented in two parts. PART ONE is the author’s legal reasoning. PART TWO is the factual basis for the author’s conclusion that Obama has held dual citizenship and is therefore ineligible to be POTUS.
http://www.potus.com/
Part One
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/200...oyalties-pt-1/
Part Two
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/200...oyalties-pt-2/
Obama resigned
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/oba...16/151934.html
his seat in the Senate on Sunday to focus on his transition to the White House, appointing new staff and thanking his home state of Illinois for launching his political career.
"Today, I am ending one journey to begin another," Obama said in a letter to the people of Illinois, describing his job representing them as one of the highest honors of his life.
"I am stepping down as senator to prepare for the responsibilities I will assume as our nation's next president," he said. "But I will never forget, and will forever be grateful to, the men and women of this great state who made my life in public service possible."
Obama's resignation as senator means he will not participate in this week's post-election session on Capitol Hill that could address the ailing economy and struggling auto industry.
I suppose it would be too much to hope that one of the lawsuits sticks. That would be the end of Obama forever.
Did Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama's Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions!
Debbie Schussel
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archi...ive_did_n.html
wants to know if President-elect Barack Hussein Obama committed a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It's either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama's official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.
But the release of Obama's draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama's claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.
Check out THIS documentation.
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archi...ive_did_n.html

Pages
Sopal
<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />
He's probably making money hand over fist from people donating to his cause.
LOL.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp
First of all, that's a paid advertisement. Secondly, I read the text of the entire ad and there is no proof anywhere.
1. As for Obama's grandmother claiming he was born in Kenya in a taped interview: Don't you wonder why the media doesn't have access to this tape? How is it authenticated -- how do we know the voice is Obama's grandmother? I can make a tape recording of a man saying "I killed Dick Cheney" and claim that it is George W. Bush's voice -- doesn't make it a fact.
2. Experts claim Obama's birth certificate is a forgery. Interesting that these "experts" aren't named, except Berg himself, whom I rather doubt is an expert on forgery. Also interesting that the Hawaiian authorities (you know, the one's who actually authenticate and release Hawaiian birth certificates?) claim that the certificate is real and legally binding. Still no explanation from you as to why they would go to such extremes to lie about this.
3. The Indonesian stuff is pure hogwash. Berg claims that Obama had to be an Indonesian citizen to attend school there, from which he infers with no proof or documentation that Obama's stepfather had to have adopted or acknowledged him -- which would have made him an Indonesian citizen. This is completely false -- if you were born in the United States, you cannot lose your citizenship so easily -- it is a formal process that requires a lot of legal documentation. You definitely DO NOT lose US citizenship just by being adopted by a foreigner. Add to that the fact that Obama was never even adopted by his stepfather, which makes the point moot from the start.
"Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) – located in 8
U.S.C. 1481 – governs the loss of US citizenship through voluntary personal
action. Short of committing treason, taking a foreign government post requiring
an oath, or pursuing other activities which would cause the Department of State
to revoke your citizenship, the way to renounce US citizenship is to make a
formal declaration.
Of course, making this formal declaration to renounce US citizenship isn’t
easy. First, it cannot (except under some unusual war-time circumstances) be
done within the United States or its territories. You must appear in person at a
US consulate in another country, presumably the country in which you already
reside legally and intend to reside thereafter. You must then sign an oath of
renunciation and hand over your US passport. Even if you take all these steps,
your renunciation may not be accepted by the State Department, especially if
they believe that you plan to return to the United States (even for a visit)
within a short period of time. If you renounce US citizen formally and it is
accepted, your name is then published in the Federal Register as a legal notice
to anyone who might be trying to locate you – including the IRS."
Nice try, though.
No, that is not true.
And the president of the Annenberg Foundation, Leonore Annenberg, was one of McCain's top donors and supporters.
Pages