BREAKING..BC suit makes it to C. Thomas
Find a Conversation
| Tue, 11-18-2008 - 11:20am |
.
The application to renew the suit to force Obama to produce his accurate, original birth certificate has now been sent to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Remember Obama trashed Clarence Thomas during the presidential debate.
Poetic justice?
.
On Friday Nov. 14, 2008, Leo C. Donofrio sent, by US Postal Express Mail, a letter, as required by Supreme Court Rule 22.4,
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalbornc...V.+17+-+LETTER
to the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court -- William K. Suter -- requesting his Emergency Stay Application
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalbornc...+SUPREME+COURT
as to the national election by renewed to the Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas by right of law, specifically Supreme Court Rule 22.4.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/22.html
As of 1:17 PM the renewed application has not been updated to the US Supreme Court automated Docket.
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm
According to Supreme Court Rule 22.1 http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/22.html
the Clerk is demanded to "transmit it promptly" to the Justice it is addressed to. Please recall that on Nov. 3rd, Donofrio originally submitted this same emergency stay application to the US Supreme Court. Despite the stay, the Clerk -- Mr. Danny Bickell -- made assurance that the application would be given to the Honorable Associate Justice David Souter that night, it was not transmitted promptly. In fact, it was not transmitted at all after Mr. Bickell, having made an illegal and improper substantive judgment of law, thereby denied the application on his own volition.
The emergency stay application was eventually submitted to the Honorable Associate Justice David Souter, four days late, on November 6, after Mr. Bickell was forced to concede that his denial had been improper.
The emergency stay application, having been brought to the US Supreme Court from a denial of the New Jersey Supreme Court, was required by Supreme Court Rule 22.3
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/22.html
to be submitted to Justice Souter as he is the Justice assigned to the Third Circuit which includes New Jersey. The application was denied by Justice Souter on Nov. 6, and such denial therefore triggered the legal right, under Rule 22.4
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/supct/22.html
to renew the emergency stay application to "any other Justice." The application to renew has now been sent to the Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas.
Hopefully, this time, the emergency stay application will be promptly transmitted to the Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas.
The renewed application was delivered to the US Supreme Court Clerk's office at exactly 7:46 AM by US Postal Express Mail.
http://www.blogtext.org/albums/natur...izen/18719.JPG
(Click link for US Postal proof of delivery.)
Tons of documentation at this site.
http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/
And, here is the .pdf file of Ambassador Alan Keyes, et al, lawsuit in California.
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/AlanKeyesSuit.pdf
Andy Martin's, lawsuit goes before the judge today in Hawaii.
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/20...vember-18-2008
The defendants in this case are Linda Lingle, the Governor of Hawaii, and Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the Director of the Hawaii State Department of Health .
The statement of claim:
1. Plaintiff requested a certified copy of the birth certificate of Senator Obama from the Department of Health and tendered the requisite fee.
2. Defendants refused to provide a copy of said certificate, invoking the confidentiality statutes of the State.
3. The issue of the Senator’s birth certificate has become a controversial topic of intense national speculation.
4. As an author who strives for factual accuracy and attempts to conduct thorough research Plaintiff wants a copy of the Senator’s birth certificate attested to by the State and not a “certificate” which is posted on a web site and which has been debunked as possibly having been altered.
5. One of the more literate and temperate analyses of the unlawfulness of the Defendants’ refusal to issue certified copies of the birth certificate is contained in Exhibit 1 attached hereto.
6. To the extent that the Defendants’ files contain or retain original supporting data for the birth certificate, Plaintiff asks that he also be supplied with that information and/or material as well.
7. It is axiomatic that the birth certificate of a presidential candidate is a document of crucial public concern and significance.
8. While Hawai’i statutes call for a balancing or weighing test where production is considered by a court, most respectfully Plaintiff submits that the balance falls entirely on the side of disclosure where the original birth certificate of a presidential candidate is concerned.
.
Divided Loyalties, Obama’s Eligibility Problem
By Judah Benjamin, Guest Author
FOREWORD by TexasDarlin
Judah Benjamin, an historian and former journalist, has written a two-part series challenging the Constitutionality of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President. It is exhaustively researched, and lengthy compared to most blog entries. However, I have left his story in tact with only minor edits because of its importance.
Although Judah Benjamin addresses the possibility that Obama was born in foreign territory, the article’s central thesis rests on the assumption that Obama was born in the United States.
Here is my 2-sentence bottom-line summation:
Barack Obama has been a citizen of multiple nations. And even if his citizenship outside the US was renounced, Article II of the U.S. Constitution prohibits him from being President, for the same reason that naturalized citizens are prohibited: divided loyalties.
The article must be read in its entirety to be fully understood and appreciated. It will be presented in two parts. PART ONE is the author’s legal reasoning. PART TWO is the factual basis for the author’s conclusion that Obama has held dual citizenship and is therefore ineligible to be POTUS.
http://www.potus.com/
Part One
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/200...oyalties-pt-1/
Part Two
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/200...oyalties-pt-2/
Obama resigned
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/oba...16/151934.html
his seat in the Senate on Sunday to focus on his transition to the White House, appointing new staff and thanking his home state of Illinois for launching his political career.
"Today, I am ending one journey to begin another," Obama said in a letter to the people of Illinois, describing his job representing them as one of the highest honors of his life.
"I am stepping down as senator to prepare for the responsibilities I will assume as our nation's next president," he said. "But I will never forget, and will forever be grateful to, the men and women of this great state who made my life in public service possible."
Obama's resignation as senator means he will not participate in this week's post-election session on Capitol Hill that could address the ailing economy and struggling auto industry.
I suppose it would be too much to hope that one of the lawsuits sticks. That would be the end of Obama forever.
Did Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama's Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions!
Debbie Schussel
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archi...ive_did_n.html
wants to know if President-elect Barack Hussein Obama committed a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?
It's either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama's official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.
But the release of Obama's draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama's claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.
Check out THIS documentation.
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archi...ive_did_n.html

Pages
<>
That's not quite true. Having an American parent does make one an American citizen, so Obama is definitely an American. However, one of the requirements of the President of the US is that one must be born in the United States of America. (Or, as in the case of John McCain, born on a US military base or of parents who are serving in the military overseas.)
Not quite, as far as I know. If you are entitled to citizenship because of your parents, then that "counts" as natural born, even for a president (we have been through this with dd and the "natural born" status made a difference in how many passports she could hold).
The "problem" in Obama's case is that at the time of his birth, the US parent had to be a certain age to confer automatic citizenship on the child, and Obama's mom was 2 months short of that date. So, the conspiracy theory in this case holds that Obama's mom flew to Kenya where she gave birth, then flew back to Hawaii and registered the birth. If there was actually any kind of proof of such a thing, it could present a problem. However, there is no reason to think this happened and nor is there any reason to think that the state of Hawaii would issue a birth certificate if the baby was born in Kenya.
The alternate conspiracy theory holds that Obama's stepdad obtained Indonesian citizenships for Obama's mom and the kids. In that process, the Indonesian authorities required Obama's mom to sign a statement that she resigned her US citizenship. However, the US does not recognize such resignations (and Obama's mom subsequently lived in the US, presumably as a citizen) and a parent can not resign the citizenship of a minor child anyway. So that one is definitely a red herring.
Actually, it's a bit more complicated than that. If a child is born abroad to an American parent, that child is automatically a U.S. citizen provided the American parent meets certain residence requirements (which have changed over the years). If the American parent does not meet the residence requirements, the child is not necessarily eligible for citizenship at birth, though I know of one family who did not meet the residence requirements but petitioned for citizenship for their child and won.
Also, a child who acquires citizenship at birth by the rule of jus sanguinis ("rule of blood") is generally considered to be a "natural born citizen" since the laws of citizenship essentially postulate two possibilities: 1) citizenship by right at birth and, 2) naturalization. Clearly children born to Americans abroad are not naturalized (I have an American birth certificate for my daughter who was born abroad, for example), so they fall into the first category along with those born on U.S. soil. However, this question about whether a child born abroad to U.S. parents is considered a "natural born citizens" for the post of the President has been long debated. Here is one interesting article on the subject (there are tons out there....):
http://www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/art2frag5_user.html
"The only issue with regard to the qualifications set out in this clause, which appears to be susceptible of argument, is whether a child born abroad of American parents is “a natural born citizen” in the sense of the clause. Such a child is a citizen as a consequence of statute.94 Whatever the term “natural born” means, it no doubt does not include a person who is “naturalized.” Thus, the answer to the question might be seen to turn on the interpretation of the first sentence of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, providing that “ll persons born or naturalized in the United States” are citizens.95 Significantly, however, Congress, in which a number of Framers sat, provided in the Naturalization act of 1790 that “the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, . . . shall be considered as natural born citizens. . . .”96 "
As far as I know, none of the debates about the issue have made a distinction between children born abroad to parents in the U.S, military and children born abroad to civilian parents.
How does that work with the birth certificate? I assume it lists the actual place of birth. Do your children also have birth certificates from the countries where they were born?
Dd just has the US one (which is where she was born as well). For the Danish citizenship we simply had to file some forms and submit her US birth certificate and they issued her a passport within 2 weeks. The Danes do not allow dual citizenship, except if you are natural born to the non-Danish ones and to the Danish one. The Greek one is more complicated, but also involves submitting proof of birth and proof that one parent is Greek.
Pages