OBAMA'S AFRAID OF RUSH

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-09-2009
OBAMA'S AFRAID OF RUSH
348
Mon, 01-26-2009 - 12:48pm

Obama: Quit Listening to Rush Limbaugh if You Want to Get Things Done

Obama warned Republicans to quit listening to Limbaugh if they want to get along with Democrats, during a White House discussion on his nearly $1 trillion stimulus package.

WASHINGTON -- President Obama warned Republicans on Capitol Hill today that they need to quit listening to radio king Rush Limbaugh if they want to get along with Democrats and the new administration.

"You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," he told top GOP leaders, whom he had invited to the White House to discuss his nearly $1 trillion stimulus package.

One White House official confirmed the comment but said he was simply trying to make a larger point about bipartisan efforts.

"There are big things that unify Republicans and Democrats," the official said. "We shouldn't let partisan politics derail what are very important things that need to get done."

That wasn't Obama's only jab at Republicans today.

While discussing the stimulus package with top lawmakers in the White House's Roosevelt Room, President Obama shot down a critic with a simple message.

"I won," he said, according to aides who were briefed on the meeting. "I will trump you on that."

The response was to the objection by Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) to the president's proposal to increase benefits for low-income workers who don't owe federal income taxes.

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-04-2009
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 1:38am

<Three of the 8 were Republican. One Independent and the rest Democrats.>


Do you have a link on that (only 3 of the 8 were Republicans)?

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-13-2008
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 1:43am
Because they agree with him. When he came on the scene conservatives said, finally - somebody who thinks like I do, "Ditto that!" He was entertaining too, thus his huge popularity.
iVillage Member
Registered: 11-13-2008
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 1:51am
Wikipedia is not always your best source. At least one of them had served more than 15 years. They are appointed and re-appointed every four years.
iVillage Member
Registered: 01-04-2009
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 2:03am

<They come up for review every four years. All of the attorneys 4 year terms were up. >


Do you have a link on the "up for review every four years" statement.

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-04-2009
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 2:18am

There is no requirement that a new president fire all US attorneys.

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-22-2009
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 3:05am

Yes, I did

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-09-2009
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 3:19am

>>> Who knows? There may be something to that, but Republicans lost the last presidential election for something other than the fact that the Democratic candidate was black. If Republicans wish to believe that race was the major reason why they lost, so be it. All the better for the Democrats, because that means that the Republicans will not do what it takes to retool their platform and will continue to shrink their potential base by not addressing the issues the concern the country.

Not really. If you'll recall the spread...48% - 54%...just 6 points...and this, in a year when the Republican candidate was 76 years old, the incumbent had approvals in the 20s, many conservatives sat out the election because of McCain's "liberalism" and record numbers of blacks voted because the election was "historic," and the economy took a nose dive RIGHT before the election...I don't think this could have been a worse year for Republicans and Obama only won by 6 points. THAT says a LOT. Deny it if you like, but the facts are the facts.

>>> They can focus on what their current base wants to the exclusion of independents and simply lose election after election. It wasn't Obama's race that made people want to a change.

It wasn't Obama either.

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-21-2009
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 8:39am

<<Percentage wise, Obama is tied with Gore at 95% (I stand corrected) of the black vote...but with record turnout, that 95% represents a notably higher number of individuals...motivated by the "historic" nature of th election.>>


There was record turnout across the board, not just among blacks. Blacks accounted for 13% (up from 11% in previous elections)

Chrissy
iVillage Member
Registered: 01-21-2009
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 8:56am

<<It wasn't Obama either.>>


So then why do you think that Obama won if it wasn't because of his race or himself? Why did so many people seem to turn towards him once the economic crisis hit? His message didn't change so it would appear that he was able to garner votes at that point due to his personality and the his pragmatic style. He stayed calm and

Chrissy
iVillage Member
Registered: 11-13-2008
Wed, 01-28-2009 - 9:06am
Obviously there is no requirement to fire them.

Pages