The right's dangerous legal argument
Find a Conversation
The right's dangerous legal argument
| Thu, 03-05-2009 - 9:46pm |
Appearing for the supporters of Prop 8, Kenneth Starr, the former Whitewater prosecutor, said the people hold the right to modify the state constitution by adding or subtracting protections for civil rights.
Court appears ready to uphold Prop. 8
Full length fiction: worlds undone
"You have no power over my body..." ~ Anne Hutchinson
"You think you know, sir!" ~ Cornflake Girl ~ Tori Amos.

Pages
>>Saying that everyone is prohibited from accessing same sex marriage is NOT saying that equaity is present, ....
Yep, you keep saying that but need to resort to other scenarios to try to
"I am not about to claim every gay person sports a halo as they go about this issue, but on balance, our conduct overall
>>> As stated previously, I have no issue with polygamy. It does bring challanges that are not present with couples, but those challenges can be addressed, I'm sure.
A lot of people obviously do.
It needn't go that far:
"As I've said, voters may vote their beliefs, but government cannot act on that belief and use it in any legal way, shape, or form."
>>> I thought you supported the notion that people are the way they are born and society should not deny them based on simply how they were naturally made
Aren't pedophiles making that same argument?
>>> Marriage is not defined in the constitution
It is in California.
>>> Marriage for same sex couples already exist in this country, and many others. It's simply a matter of time before it's nation wide here.
I'm sure there were many people in California who felt that way last May.
>>...no one who chooses to live a sinful, depraved life will ever be content/happy with themselves.
I'm sorry, but that's going a bit too far!
I disagree.
Full length fiction: worlds undone
"You have no power over my body..." ~ Anne Hutchinson
Pages