The right's dangerous legal argument
Find a Conversation
The right's dangerous legal argument
| Thu, 03-05-2009 - 9:46pm |
Appearing for the supporters of Prop 8, Kenneth Starr, the former Whitewater prosecutor, said the people hold the right to modify the state constitution by adding or subtracting protections for civil rights.
Court appears ready to uphold Prop. 8
Full length fiction: worlds undone
"You have no power over my body..." ~ Anne Hutchinson
"You think you know, sir!" ~ Cornflake Girl ~ Tori Amos.

Pages
Soon, the law of the USA will include equality for it's gay citizens as well.
Please point out where anyone is supporting vandalim?
Consenting gay couples do no such thing.
That's a comparison born of fearmongering.
>>> Interacial marriage was called "extraordinary rights" to. It was wrong then, it's still wrong.
More anonymous quotes conjured to bolster your argument?
>>> Soon, the USSC will determine that equality is the only option.
Unlikely...especially when many other states follow California's example.
Many states folowed the example of banning interracial marriages too.
The supreme court took care of that, and they'll ultimately do what's right here.
Oh my, that has to be the biggest load of crap I've read in quite a while.
his laws always have & always will govern it.
LOL!
>>> The USSC will decide it, as they have in the past.
Doubtful. In order for the USSC to federally legalize gay marriage, they would have to invalidate the state constitution of California (for one). Not likely.
>>> Equality will win. It always does, in the end.
We already have equality.
Pages