The right's dangerous legal argument
Find a Conversation
The right's dangerous legal argument
| Thu, 03-05-2009 - 9:46pm |
Appearing for the supporters of Prop 8, Kenneth Starr, the former Whitewater prosecutor, said the people hold the right to modify the state constitution by adding or subtracting protections for civil rights.
Court appears ready to uphold Prop. 8
Full length fiction: worlds undone
"You have no power over my body..." ~ Anne Hutchinson
"You think you know, sir!" ~ Cornflake Girl ~ Tori Amos.

Pages
Beyond close, right on target.
What people do wrt to their personally chosen religion has not one thing to do with legal marriage.
If you really want to "defend" marriage, outlaw divorce and affairs.
Equality does not threaten marriage.
:)
>>> What people do wrt to their personally chosen religion has not one thing to do with legal marriage.
Of course it does. Most people get married in a church...and the state recognizes the authority of that ceremony.
>>> Since legal marriage is not a sacrament, the "it redefines the sacrament" bit falls flat. Legal marriage is legal marriage. Period.
I'm happy you're willing to accept civil unions as the legal instrument for gay marriage. That will help solve the problem and give gays all of the rights they say they're looking for.
>>> I wonder whose rights will be next on the chopping block, once equality in marriage is no longer an issue?
Oh, I expect that after the CA SC upholds the people's constitutional amendment that the gay community will still be hard at work trying to force their policies down the throats of other Americans.
>>> Equality does not threaten marriage.
You're right...which is why everyone has an equal right to participate in marriage.
>>> Beyond close, right on target. Many of those same arguements have already been posted in this thread. History repeating itself...yet again.
Faux arguments paraphrased or simply made up to create a smokescreen...and unconvincing smokescreen.
>>> Equal rights won last time, and they will again this time.
Hopefully...equal rights, not demands for extraordinary rights.
Pages