Prop 8 upheld by Supreme Court
Find a Conversation
Prop 8 upheld by Supreme Court
| Tue, 05-26-2009 - 8:49pm |
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prop8-decision27-2009may27,0,6677891.story
Prop. 8 upheld by California Supreme Court

Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times
Engaged couple Robert Franco, right, and Shawn Higgins kiss as San Francisco police line up to arrest anti-Proposition 8 demonstrators.
The justices uphold the same-sex marriage ban but also rule that the 18,000 gay couples who wed before the November vote will stay married. The decision is sure to spark another ballot box fight.
By Maura Dolan
11:44 AM PDT, May 26, 2009
11:44 AM PDT, May 26, 2009
Reporting from San Francisco -- The California Supreme Court today upheld Proposition 8's ban on same-sex marriage but also ruled that gay couples who wed before the election will continue to be married under state law.
The decision virtually ensures another fight at the ballot box over marriage rights for gays. Gay rights activists say they may ask voters to repeal the marriage ban as early as next year, and opponents have pledged to fight any such effort. Proposition 8 passed with 52% of the vote.
The decision virtually ensures another fight at the ballot box over marriage rights for gays. Gay rights activists say they may ask voters to repeal the marriage ban as early as next year, and opponents have pledged to fight any such effort. Proposition 8 passed with 52% of the vote.

Pages
WOW... excellent point. I never even considered that.
I know of a couple "kissing cousins"... A very dear friend of mine fell in love with his cousin. And they didn't know they were cousins until deep into their relationship. It is unfortunate, because he still thinks about her.
I just wanted to pop in and let you know that your arguments are completely understandable, and very compelling to those of us who can think logically.
Seriously?
Take what you want of it...
>>>Whatever works for you! You are a waste of my time!
It's such a waste that it HAD to be written, right?
I think your logic has frustrated the libs so much that it's become impossible to have a respectful debate.... don't worry, happens to me all the time.
:o)
Uggg....
Since when is a picture of an aborted fetus, a picture of a "cute" baby?????
Just because the fetus is 1-2 inches long, head to rump (lets all keep in mind that this does not include it's legs), doesn't mean that when it's tiny little limbs are torn apart that they are not recognizable.
I once posted a picture of my ultrasound here.... It was commented that it was an ultrasound of an older fetus.... NO, it was at 10wks of pregnancy. It was very clear, his legs, arms, hands, head.
Here is Kenneth at 7 weeks, 6 days of gestation:
approx 1.2 inches from head to rump in this photo
Pages