Right Wing on Women: 1-10 over IQ

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-24-2010
Right Wing on Women: 1-10 over IQ
Sat, 06-05-2010 - 2:46pm

Now a right wing news site is rating the "hottness" of female right wing pundits. The right wing values a woman's looks scale of 1-10 in evaluating whether they should listen to her political views.

Should a low looks score hurt women's chances as potential right wing stars? Should a "9 or 10" be rocket fuel. Think Sarah Palin. Think of all the modelcasters on Fox News. Where have the Maggie Thatchers gone?


When it comes to the political skills and astuteness of women, and people in general, Democrats care a lot more about IQ than how "hot" women are on a scale of 1 to 10.

This should be a wakeup call for Republicans. Instead, I have no doubt that they will either ignore it, or they'll defiantly claim it's great for some crazy reason or another and try to trash Democrats.


iVillage Member
Registered: 09-26-2010
Tue, 10-05-2010 - 10:54pm

I tend to agree, though looks often are a factor in politics I guess it's all a matter of degree.

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-27-2010
Thu, 09-30-2010 - 2:44pm

iVillage Member
Registered: 11-10-2006
Wed, 06-09-2010 - 6:21pm

Guess I should have looked ahead before my other response.




iVillage Member
Registered: 11-10-2006
Wed, 06-09-2010 - 6:16pm

Did you notice the super fast "disclaimer" that flashes at the end saying "all still photos have been photoshopped for your viewing pleasure.




iVillage Member
Registered: 02-14-2010
Wed, 06-09-2010 - 1:48pm

"Give me a break. Fox is shopping news porn and you know it."

How about Green Bay? Remember this hussy?:


iVillage Member
Registered: 09-30-2009
Wed, 06-09-2010 - 9:57am

"ANYONE looking for a candid, thoughtful, and honest discussion need not be afraid to discuss ANYTHING

iVillage Member
Registered: 02-14-2010
Wed, 06-09-2010 - 8:04am

"Read this please: "Investors are putting their money on President Barack Obama’s stewardship of the U.S. economy even as his job-approval rating has declined,"

People put money into heavily subsidized programs. Nothing new in that. And the market has been highly subsidized since Barry came to town.

But people put their money where they think it will do the best, either short or long term. Here's what they think about how Barry's running the show:


"one of the most prominent megabank chiefs, who once boasted to friends of voting for Obama, now refers to him privately as a ‘Chicago mob guy.' Do all your brethren feel this way? I asked. ‘Oh, not everybody-just most of them,' he replied. ‘Jamie ? Lloyd ? They might not say Obama's a socialist, but they come pretty close.'""

As with all liberal economic systems, the junkie 'fixes' Barry's put into place will soon collapse. You have heard of Moody's right?

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-02-2009
Wed, 06-09-2010 - 12:02am

Pssst... here's a little secret. Don't tell anyone. TV stations have been doing this for decades, long before Fox even existed.

Things sure are looking good for November if this is the best the left can come up with. And, I don't think FoxNews is even running for anything.

"Resist, we much. We must, and we much. About that, be committed."

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-24-2010
Tue, 06-08-2010 - 11:48pm

You are joking right? You seriously don't think that looks is not a primary objective when Fox picks it's women anchors, do you?

You don't like the images. You want to pretend that Fox anchors don't sex up the airwaves to attract viewers based on hot legs and porn rather than good news?

Fine. Ignore all the images linked to below too.

It's all a big liberal conspiracy lie, right? Rupert Murdoch would never even think of using sex to hook news viewers on his right wing news shows, right?

I suggest you look at all these random links that took about 10 minutes to find and try to stop and think a while before you answer.






"Sometimes it even seems that Fox might have some top secret lab it uses to create beautiful women just for the sake of bringing a stunning visual to TV news. We all know that's not the case, but for some reason Fox seems to attract some of best eye candy in the televised news media business to its ranks, and that in turn attracts more viewers. You might not agree with some of the personalities on the channel, but it's hard to disagree that the women are extremely attractive. So the debate seems settled for now, as Fox News is winning the battle with its seemingly endless supply of stunning news anchor women day in and out."




"onservative watchdog groups are giving Fox News flack for their gratuitously hot anchorwomen and their short skirts. We're actually surprised that news journalism has gotten thus far without realizing that people will only care about your stories if someone hot is delivering them to you."




iVillage Member
Registered: 01-24-2010
Tue, 06-08-2010 - 11:14pm

To put this as politely as possible, you are way off base. See real world proof after ****

"America is slowly digging itself out of the fallout from the Bush jobless recovery followed by the Bush recession."
Reality doesn't agree with your statement.

****Read this please: "Investors are putting their money on President Barack Obama’s stewardship of the U.S. economy even as his job-approval rating has declined, according to a global quarterly poll of investors and analysts who are Bloomberg subscribers." http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601010&sid=aaE0ossGaCAQ

"President Obama got healthcare done"
Yea,I'm hoping that gets fixed aong with all of Barry's other failures.

****Why is President Obama's healthcare reform bill a failure before it even begins to take effect and President Obama is not even halfway through his first term but the policies of our last President, a Republican with 8 years in office, are something not to be spoken about? Can we please be fair here? Republicans had their 8 years and it did not go so well. In fact, the Republicans did just about everything they say they are against when they held power - Republicans ran up huge deficits even during a period of economic growth, they embarked on an unnecessary war, and Republicans spied on ordinary citizens, tortured people and took away our liberty in the name of fighting two bit terrorists. It's time for everyone to give the Democrats a fair chance already.

"McCain picked Palin despite her total inexperience because she was eye candy."
Actally it was Barry with total inexperience. He hadn't even warm his non-executive senate seat before he abandoned his job to run for president.

****Why do you keep ignoring the fact that President Obama ran a successful campaign for President? Why when a Republican wins a Presidential election is it a mandate but when a Democrat wins by more he's just an inexperienced politician who has failed before he even had a chance to get started? A little fairness please?

"see her for the inexperienced, unqualified sub-Dan Quayle candidate"
And yet, there liberals are, continuing to vent smoke out of their ears over her.

****Sarah Palin makes Dan Quayle look like Winston Churchill. It may take time, but you will see how things continue to fall down around her as she promotes herself upwards. Unfortunately for you, it will be the Republicans' loss.

"If this is what the Republicans are about I am all for her getting more and more and more attention."
Na, what I said was is she's holding liberal's attention and anything that distracts them I'm fully in support of.

****Again, this is something on which we agree! I am happy to keep talking about Sarah Palin if you want to. Deal?