I notice that this website is mostly a right wing column. It's hardly a "fair and balanced" news outlet. Not saying the whole article is useless BUT I would like to see that whole story from a different media outlet.
What's fair and balanced about telling people their voices can't be heard...just because you're upset that your side's voices didn't care enough to participate?
I notice that this website is mostly a right wing column. It's hardly a "fair and balanced" news outlet. Not saying the whole article is useless BUT I would like to see that whole story from a different media outlet.
It doesn't change the message.. Liberals push for Fairness on this because they can't play the same way.
What's fair and balanced about telling people their voices can't be heard...just because you're upset that your side's voices didn't care enough to participate?
I would ask you to please stop telling me what I think or feel. Your phrase was
Pages
This is the
This is the perfect example of liberals...
Aren't we?
What's fair and balanced about telling people their voices can't be heard...just because you're upset that your side's voices didn't care enough to participate?
I notice that this website is mostly a right wing column. It's hardly a "fair and balanced" news outlet. Not saying the whole article is useless BUT I would like to see that whole story from a different media outlet.
It doesn't change the message.. Liberals push for Fairness on this because they can't play the same way.
What's fair and balanced about telling people their voices can't be heard...just because you're upset that your side's voices didn't care enough to participate?
The "you're" was meant to be a general "you".
Not you.
<>
Ummmm interesting comment and quite ironic
Pages