Goggle sued for refusing prolife ads

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-17-2006
Goggle sued for refusing prolife ads
7
Tue, 04-08-2008 - 9:55pm
.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=558177&in_page_id=1770


Christian group sues Google after search engine refuses to take its abortion adverts

By SIMON CALDWELL 9th April 2008


A Christian group is suing Google over the internet giant's refusal to take its anti-abortion adverts.



The Christian Institute, a "non-denominational Christian charity", wanted to pay Google so that whenever the word "abortion" was typed into the popular search engine, its link would appear on the side of the screen.

The link would have read: "UK abortion law - news and views on abortion from the Christian Institute. www.christian.org.uk."

But Google refused the advert because it said it had a policy of declining sites which mixed the issue of abortion with religious views.

Its Dublin-based advertising team replied: "At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain 'abortion and religion-related content'."

Google does, however, accept adverts for abortion clinics, secular pro-abortion sites and secularist sites which attack religion.

The Christian Institute has now started legal proceedings against Google on the grounds that it is infringing the Equality Act 2006 by discriminating against Christian groups.

It is seeking damages, costs and the permission to publish its advertisement.

Mike Judge, Christian Institute spokesman, said: "For many people, Google is the doorway to the internet.

"If there is to be a free exchange of ideas then Google cannot give special free speech rights to secular groups whilst censoring religious views.

"To say that religious sites with material on abortion are 'unacceptable content' (while) advertising pornography is ridiculous."

The group was supported by the Christian former Tory minister Ann Widdecombe, who said: "It does seem to me to be the most appalling and blatant case of religious discrimination and also to be a very silly attempt to stifle due debate."

The institute sought to promote its online articles on abortion ahead of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill arriving in the House of Commons next month.

The Bill will provide the first opportunities in 18 years for MPs to vote on the upper time limit for abortions: currently 24 weeks

~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~**~

 

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-13-2006
Wed, 04-09-2008 - 12:40pm

As en extension to my previous post: searching on the terms did not hinder me from obtaining a copious amounts or results (e.g. website links).

"It is right to be contented with what we have, but never with what we are."

iVillage Member
Registered: 01-13-2006
Wed, 04-09-2008 - 11:41am

I Googled the following phrases:


Prochoice Christian, Prolife Christian, Abortion Christian, abortion Prochoice

"It is right to be contented with what we have, but never with what we are."

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2004
Wed, 04-09-2008 - 8:41am

Just a note on the legal side - if Google UK is judged to have discriminated against the advertising on religious grounds, they will lose the case. It's not legal to refuse service because of the religion of the customer.


Whether they'll be able to prove religious discrimination is another matter though.


baby siggy
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-19-2006
Wed, 04-09-2008 - 7:34am
As a private entity they have a right to accept or refuse ads from any group they want for any reason they want.




&_c02_owner=1&_c=blogpart" />



Photobucket

I love my computer
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-06-2008
Tue, 04-08-2008 - 10:52pm
If it not an issue of fairness though. It is about the law. As far as I am aware
Photobucket
iVillage Member
Registered: 02-04-2008
Tue, 04-08-2008 - 10:17pm
Can I ask, how do you feel about it?

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-17-2007
Tue, 04-08-2008 - 10:16pm

I am under the impression that, as a private company, it is free to accept whichever advertising they choose.

"If there is to be a free exchange of ideas then Google cannot give special free speech rights to secular groups whilst censoring religious views."

Does Google provide rights to anyone for anything? I wasn't aware it was a government entity.




Powered by CGISpy.com


Thanks