Pro-choice vs. Pro-life

By the way, I note your icon. I also realise that you are new to debate. You may want to bear in mind that this is not personal.

no way, the abortions would still happen. There are medical reasons to have them, and in the end the mother needs to choses what is best for her. However, I do not believe in it as a form of birthcontrol...meaning people who have several abortions because they were just unsafe. I know not EVERYONE does this and this isn't the only reason they have the abortions.

~Basic. Pro-choice. Stance. You choose what's right for you, and I'll choose what's right for me.~

Exactly.

<Well that is the whole inbetween with the "pro child thing">

I don't consider it an inbetween. I consider it to be the basic pro-choice stance.

You've explained it pretty well, I think I understand the concept.

Me:

You: Well it isn't "My definition" I didn't make this stuff up.

Ok. The definition which you have espoused and talked about in this thread.

I'm not sure where you get that I think it doesn't exist. I am debating it, so clearly I do think it exists.

LOL! Again, the fact that I am debating the concept with you pretty clearly indicates that I am not turning a blind eye to it. I just don't think it's necessary, since what you call pro-child is the basic pro-choice stance.