You are mistaking a lighthearted observation for condescention.
Hmmm... I detect something nefarious in your tone lol :)
Then it is used as a form of birth control after the fact.
For medical reasons, yes. But for convenience, no.>
I don't agree that an abortion has to be for medical reasons in order to be necessary.
Are you sure you're PC?
It is not your call how someone states their opinion on a debate board or why.>
So why can't BWZ state her opinion that generalities have no place in this issue?
But most abortions are not because of those reasons. Most are done for the reasons I stated in my previous post----teenager, single, poor, incovenient time of life, as the result of an affair, etc.>
Taking the above paragraphs into account, could you explain to me in what way you are pro=choice?
So if a person has a chemical abortion very early in her pregnancy (iow before the heart beats), she hasn't really had an abortion?
Just a point of order - the general rule is that if one makes a claim, one must back it up if asked to. It's not good form to challenge someone else to disprove a claim one has made.