I was agreeing with you so I am not sure wha your talking about. I was saying, Obama says one thing, McCain says another, and the truth is somewhere in between.
Sandy, I am not asking you to explain until you are "blue in the face". I truly want to know what you find inflammatory about the ad. In your opinion, what specifically is the "smear"? I'm really trying to understand your thoughts on the matter, I am not trying to incite an argument.
Pages
ah well since I said that in direct correlation with the ad in question .. I thought it was in relation to that as well.
I didn't realize you were speaking in a different context.
But I do agree (generally speaking of course) that the truth is usually somwhere in the middle.
then we agree. except your name isn't Bea.
Bea
Sure, she *could have* e-mailed someone else in the campaign, but why would she?
well it is the net ... I very well could be Bea ;-)
but I am not ... lol!
the point is ... you can't factually say 'she emailed mccain' based on a statement of 'I sent off an email'.
just as you can't factually say 'he can do email' based on that.
you can only assume.
True, it is an assumption.
<>
Sandy, I am not asking you to explain until you are "blue in the face". I truly want to know what you find inflammatory about the ad. In your opinion, what specifically is the "smear"? I'm really trying to understand your thoughts on the matter, I am not trying to incite an argument.
Chrissy
mom to Aidan 8/21/03
Grayson Blaine 12/30/07
<
but I am not ... lol!>>
oooh, scary thought. two of me. that sometimes disagree.
wait. that's my daughters.
Bea
Pages