It bothers me that those who oppose choice to the extent they also oppose measures to increase availability of contraception try to couch it in terms of being pro-women. It isn't. Pro-choice means support for full range of options, not those opposed.
One side is anti-options, anti-availability for those of lesser means. Apparently some reshaping of choice becomes if you are of means you get options, if not, too bad, so sad.
I really don't understand how the making minimum health care coverage requirements as recommended by the Institute of Medicine is intrusive and freedom limiting, but transvaginal ultrasound laws by state legislators are just fine.Which side is anti-women?
The video was about the mandate... I said what I thought about healthcare as a whole already, And the only comparison b/w offering up heatlhcare to everybody but not requiring everybody to pay for it - and - say, auto insurance is if you neglect to pay for a policy but still drive a car. That becomes a cost we all pay for when you're ticketed for speeding, when you're in a wreck and don't pay for that too.
And the other side is, let's keep government in my pants because I can't make these decisions that surround sex by myself, Victim, Wahh.. I do think society has created a lot of its own problems, I am whole so I don't know what you're asking there, Nobody is telling you how you should live. But let's create all these new laws to protect us.... Phooey!
Government wouldn't be in your pants, because it isn't telling you to use anything. It's making sure the *option* is there for you.
We need to cover everyone for health insurance. How do we do this? Please offer up your ideas, because not to do so is to favour the 'let them die' approach, or what I call Repubnocare.
Someone who's words are powerful, as you put it, would make me interested in what she was saying and see her side of what she is discussing, even if I disagree with her.
“Clearly," said Arthur,"you're an idiot- but you're our kind of idiot. Come on.” ― Markus Zusak, The Book Thief