The goal isn't to take away all guns.
Find a Conversation
The goal isn't to take away all guns.
| Mon, 01-07-2013 - 11:48am |
Despite the scare tactics so typical of the right - see health care - there is no desire to take away all guns amongst most on the left. That is how the right wants to define the debate, as all or nothing. It knows it wins in that case.
All we want is common sense, but listen to, see the howls and declarations of 'you won't take away my gun!'
Which position is actually rational and reasoned?
Pages
One of the reason the 2nd amendment is under fire is the H Clinton wants to have the US under the thumb of the UN.
"it is becoming a new feudal age. Many moderates and liberals see the danger.
Are you referring to the elites oppressing the common folk? I agree...but it seems that has always been the case."
Today is is more subtle. We don't have a warrior class to impose on the common citizen but a moneyed elite.
One of the reason the 2nd amendment is under fire is the H Clinton wants to have the US under the thumb of the UN.
It's not just Hitlary, it seems that Obama, as well as many of the Democratic elite wish for the same thing.
Today is is more subtle. We don't have a warrior class to impose on the common citizen but a moneyed elite.
Yes, the moneyed elite do try to oppress their views on to the "common citizen"...but sadly, so does the left through their manipulation of the political class and the uninformed masses.
I agree the average Americanhas been let down by the elected officials. our government is at the beck and call of the billionaires. One thing they fear is an armed electorate. What the end game is for them: oligarchy!
Pages