The Marriage Debate: How far????
Find a Conversation
The Marriage Debate: How far????
| Mon, 10-06-2008 - 3:34pm |
In CA, we are about to vote on a constitutional amendment on whether marriage should be defined as between a man and woman.

Pages
Honestly, my thinking is that a civil union is simply a contract that is entered into, and should be legal as long as both (or all) parties are legally able to enter into the contract.
When you ask the government to redefine marriage, it extends into that venue, that religious-dominated spectrum that I am not sure government really needs to be involved in.
>>I think you could do one or the other, but you give up certain rights if you don't have them both<<
No legal rights occur in the US as a result of religious marriage.
"The pengiuns would poop all over everything, not clean up, and always want it C~O~L~D. LoL "
That took me a second, to think of exactly HOW that is different from a marriage to a man??
"No legal rights occur in the US as a result of religious marriage.
What's the real difference between civil unions and marriage?
Ah, got it.
Pages