Obama's Weathermen Pals

iVillage Member
Registered: 10-07-2003
Obama's Weathermen Pals
114
Fri, 10-10-2008 - 3:23am
Obama's Weathermen pals should worry voters

DEROY MURDOCK



Barack Obama's supporters have trivialized his connections to former Weather Underground terrorists William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. "This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood," Obama told ABC's George Stephanopoulos on April 16. Campaign strategist David Axelrod told CNN Monday that Obama "certainly didn't know the history" of these two barbarians when they hosted a reception for him when he launched his political career.


Obama might not have heard of Ayers and Dohrn's brutality from the '60s through the '80s had they merely tossed a rock or two in anger. But these two went much, much farther.


In 1970, Ayers encapsulated the Weathermen's worldview: "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home. Kill your parents." In his 2001 memoir, "Fugitive Days," Ayers brags that he helped blast NYPD headquarters in 1970, the U.S. Capitol in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972.


Dohrn was an equally stalwart subversive. In July 1969, while John McCain languished in the Hanoi Hilton, Dohrn and five other Weathermen flew to Cuba to conspire with the National Liberation Front, America's North Vietnamese enemies. Dohrn was on the FBI's 10 Most Wanted List. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover called her "the most dangerous woman in America."


Throughout the 1970s, under Ayers and Dohrn's leadership, the Weathermen blasted the State Department, Gulf Oil's Pittsburgh headquarters, and New York's Queens Courthouse, among at least 16 targets.


Thankfully, one particular bomb detonated early. Three Weathermen fatally blew themselves up in March 1970 while building it in a Greenwich Village townhouse. The Weathermen wanted the nail-filled device to explode at New Jersey's Fort Dix Army base during a non-commissioned officers' dance. Soldiers, their spouses, and dates would have been maimed and likely killed. As Ayers said, the bomb would have ripped "through windows and walls and, yes, people too."


No wonder Obama has been so evasive about his ties to Ayers and Dohrn. His relationship with these extreme Leftists goes far beyond waving at some folks who live nearby. It defies belief that Obama never learned that Ayers and Dohrn hated the USA and loved TNT.


Obama chaired the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which Ayers inaugurated. They jointly attended at least seven of that charity's top-level oversight meetings between March 1995 and September 1997. They jointly met a dozen times as board members of Chicago's Woods Fund between December 1999 and December 2002. They appeared together on two academic panels in 1997 and 2002. Obama concisely reviewed one of Ayers' books in the Chicago Tribune.


Ayers and Dohrn invited Windy City liberals into their living room to meet Obama when he began his 1995 State Senate run. Ayers donated $200 to re-elect Obama in 2001.


These considerable ties might be irrelevant if Ayers and Dohrn regretted their actions. But they are far from remorseful.


"I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough," Ayers said in an interview published Sept. 11, 2001 -- while Obama knew Ayers. That August, Ayers posed for a Chicago Magazine photo in which he stomped on an American flag crumpled in the dirt. Headline: "No regrets."


"We'd do it again," Dohrn told ABC in 1998. "I wish that we had done more. I wish we had been more militant."


If these facts are news to Obama, he must be the most oblivious man on Chicago's South Side. But if he knew about Ayers and Dohrn's background, he is being untruthful about it. At the very least, Obama showed dreadful judgment by closely and repeatedly associating with these violent traitors.


Obama today calls Ayers' behavior "detestable acts." But what did Ayers and Dohrn see in Obama? What inspired these unrepentant, hard-Left bomb throwers to hand the chairmanship of Ayers' foundation and then share their home and friends with the charismatic then-35-year-old whose current 95.5 percent Left-wing vote record made him The National Journal's "Most Liberal Senator In 2007?"


Deroy Murdock is a columnist with Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University. E-mail him at deroy.Murdock@gmail.com

Pages

Avatar for mommastacie
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-20-2003
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 1:32pm
The State can find you guilty even tho it's not a federal crime. :o/ I remember reading about it a while ago.. here's a link about it: http://atheism.about.com/od/flagburningstatelaws/a/StateLawSummary.htm BUT each State has a different opinion on what "desecration" actually is.


border=0>


Other places you can find me:

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-10-2003
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 1:36pm

Um, a supreme court ruling that burning/desecrating a flag is a constitutionally protected form of free speech would overrule the laws of the states, now wouldn't it?


Supreme Court Strikes Down All Laws Banning Flag Desecration (1989): Outside the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Gregory Lee Johnson burned a flag in protest against President Ronald Reagan's policies. He was arrested under Texas' flag desecration statute. In its 5-4 ruling in Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court struck down flag desecration laws in 48 states by ruling that flag desecration is a constitutionally protected form of free speech.


http://civilliberty.about.com/od/freespeech/p/flagburning.htm

Photobucket Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-10-2003
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 1:40pm
It's not enforceable if the Supreme Court says it flies in the face of the constitution.

Photobucket

Avatar for mommastacie
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-20-2003
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 1:41pm
Which is one of the main reasons for the Supreme Court ;o) They can still uphold State Laws on desecration if they deem it bad enough tho.


border=0>


Other places you can find me:

iVillage Member
Registered: 08-31-2008
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 1:52pm
Defacing a flag is an act of protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, as established in Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), and reaffirmed in U.S. v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990).

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-10-2003
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 1:53pm

It remains fascinating to me, though, that the people who seem so upset by the picture of Bill Ayers standing on the flag are the ones all up in arms about the idea that Obama *might* want to enact some gun laws.

Photobucket

Avatar for mommastacie
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-20-2003
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 2:01pm


border=0>


Other places you can find me:

iVillage Member
Registered: 07-24-2006
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 2:17pm

I have to say this was very smooth twisting of words and facts.

Photobucket

iVillage Member
Registered: 12-18-2005
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 2:35pm

<(there are none against stomping on it).

-Kristen

Photobucket
iVillage Member
Registered: 07-10-2003
Tue, 10-14-2008 - 2:53pm

I was just trying to enlighten the person who couldn't understand why people don't like flags being stomped.


Thanks for trying to "enlighten" me, but I think that if you truly took the time to read my posts in this thread thoughtfully, you would see that it isn't that I don't understand.

Photobucket

Pages