Palin unable to name another SCOTUS case
Find a Conversation
Palin unable to name another SCOTUS case
| Wed, 10-01-2008 - 9:30pm |
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/01/eveningnews/main4493062.shtml#ccmm
I hope Biden hands it to her tomorrow night. I'm SURE I won't be disappointed, after these little displays of "knowledge".
You're right- let Sarah be Sarah! And there she is, in all her glory!
Exxon Valdez was decided recently, she even appeared on television discussing it, as something she disagreed with! As a staunch opponent of abortion, Casey v. Planned Parenthood or Doe v. Bolton. Heck, if she was REALLY desperate throw out Plessy v. Ferguson, then chatter away about how far America's come. Really, how hard could this be? Unless...she genuinely didn't know. The more likely scenario.
I don't know how intelligent people can continue to stand behind this.

Oh, good grief!!
In case anybody is having trouble with the link:
Couric: What other Supreme Court decisions do you disagree with?
Palin: Well, let's see. There's, of course in the great history of America there have been rulings, that's never going to be absolute consensus by every American. And there are those issues, again, like Roe v. Wade, where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there. So you know, going through the history of America, there would be others but …
Couric: Can you think of any?
Palin: Well, I could think of … any again, that could be best dealt with on a more local level. Maybe I would take issue with. But, you know, as mayor, and then as governor and even as a vice president, if I'm so privileged to serve, wouldn't be in a position of changing those things but in supporting the law of the land as it reads today.
She doesn't sound like someone I'd like to have a beer with, she sounds like someone who's already had a few beers.