"I want things to change. I look at McCain/Palin and see nothing that will change things for the better. I look at Obama and see someone that wants things to be the way I want them to be. I see someone that has some really good ideas and can hire experienced people to put them into action. I look at McCain on the issues and hope he won't be able to put them into action."
What I find funny is this. People hate Bush, right? Something like the worst approval rating in history, or close to it?
McCain voted WITH BUSH 90% of the time. That means that the only "change" he can point to is a *ten percent difference.*
A ten percent difference from George W. Bush is not "change."
Also, I guess there must be a heck of a lot of rich folks in this country who want to vote McCain, because for most of us, Obama's tax proposals save us a TON.
If you're in the bottom of the economic pyramid -- which basically amounts to making less than $66,000 a year, like 60% of us in this country do, both candidates plan to cut taxes, yes, but Obama's cutting them WAY more.
For instance, if you're making $37,000 a year, McCain's tax proposal will save you $113 dollars. Obama's? Well, you're getting back nearly $900 from him.
I'm not pretending to be a tax expert, but the Brookings Institution, which provided this information, definitely IS.
Well, hey -- if Obama is elected, I'm sure we'll all weep for those poor millionaires who'll suffer terribly under his tax cuts. Good thing that we'll actually be able to afford the Kleenex to do it.
I read neither of those comments in her post. she said Harvard is "the most prestigious law school in our nation." you can infer from his acceptance whatever you like.
<>
he could say there was a hateful sermon, it was on one of the alternate sundays he did not attend and he doesn't buy sermons on tape. otherwise, you don't now what he did or did not hear. once again, you can only infer.
<>
now you really lost me. why would Palin meet 5 reporters from the Enquirer (National Enquirer?) and what does that have to do with innuendo? if she met them, it's no longer innuendo - is it? usually they make up stuff about people who don't talk to them - not people that do. if she chooses to meet with them, what does that have to do with the media treatment of Obama?
now you really lost me. why would Palin meet 5 reporters from the Enquirer (National Enquirer?) and what does that have to do with innuendo? if she met them, it's no longer innuendo - is it? usually they make up stuff about people who don't talk to them - not people that do. if she chooses to meet with them, what does that have to do with the media treatment of Obama?
Pages
It's clear that you are unsure of what prejudice means.
"The Governor's educational history has been investigated,
Amd, you said,
"I want things to change. I look at McCain/Palin and see nothing that will change things for the better. I look at Obama and see someone that wants things to be the way I want them to be. I see someone that has some really good ideas and can hire experienced people to put them into action. I look at McCain on the issues and hope he won't be able to put them into action."
What I find funny is this. People hate Bush, right? Something like the worst approval rating in history, or close to it?
McCain voted WITH BUSH 90% of the time. That means that the only "change" he can point to is a *ten percent difference.*
A ten percent difference from George W. Bush is not "change."
Also, I guess there must be a heck of a lot of rich folks in this country who want to vote McCain, because for most of us, Obama's tax proposals save us a TON.
Check this out - it's from the Washington Post, hardly a Democratic mouthpiece:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/06/09/ST2008060900950.html
If you're in the bottom of the economic pyramid -- which basically amounts to making less than $66,000 a year, like 60% of us in this country do, both candidates plan to cut taxes, yes, but Obama's cutting them WAY more.
For instance, if you're making $37,000 a year, McCain's tax proposal will save you $113 dollars. Obama's? Well, you're getting back nearly $900 from him.
I'm not pretending to be a tax expert, but the Brookings Institution, which provided this information, definitely IS.
Well, hey -- if Obama is elected, I'm sure we'll all weep for those poor millionaires who'll suffer terribly under his tax cuts. Good thing that we'll actually be able to afford the Kleenex to do it.
OK, well - Obama got into Harvard Law using those records.
<>
I read neither of those comments in her post. she said Harvard is "the most prestigious law school in our nation." you can infer from his acceptance whatever you like.
<>
he could say there was a hateful sermon, it was on one of the alternate sundays he did not attend and he doesn't buy sermons on tape. otherwise, you don't now what he did or did not hear. once again, you can only infer.
<>
now you really lost me. why would Palin meet 5 reporters from the Enquirer (National Enquirer?) and what does that have to do with innuendo? if she met them, it's no longer innuendo - is it? usually they make up stuff about people who don't talk to them - not people that do. if she chooses to meet with them, what does that have to do with the media treatment of Obama?
Bea
now you really lost me. why would Palin meet 5 reporters from the Enquirer (National Enquirer?) and what does that have to do with innuendo? if she met them, it's no longer innuendo - is it? usually they make up stuff about people who don't talk to them - not people that do. if she chooses to meet with them, what does that have to do with the media treatment of Obama?
For that matter, why are beauty pageants so popular?
Thank you for posting that.
Palin is the only one with integrity.
Pages