what is the correct number of people without insurance?
I would read up on vaccination were I you. Each vaccine is much less than 100% effective so if your child is round kids who are not vaccinated and they catch a disease, your child is at risk.
>>Sorry can't change my opinion<<
well, you can, but I understand it is unlikely you will.
>>I am sorry about your husband being diabetic. My uncle was also diabetic, he also had cancer. We lost him this year. He however was able to find work with a company that did offer pre-existing condition insurance. I don't have an answer for you on this, because as I've stated before, we just have to try to find a good job with good insurance. I'm sorry, I just don't believe that our tax dollars should have to pay for everyone to have insurance.<<
Wow, so your answer really IS "sorry, but if you can't find an insurance which will accept preexisting conditions, you will simply have to die. You aren't my problem." Do you feel any compassion for anyone who is in circumstances through no fault of their own: the mentally ill, the chronically sick, victims of natural disasters, babies with cancer -- anyone?
I really do not comprehend how someone with your point of view defines "society".
I do appreciate your "sorry" though my husband no longer has Type 1 diabetes.
I think that the US automakers sat on their profits and their dividends and they complained (and still complain) that it is too expensive to invest in technology that will meet new cafe standards, not to mention meet goals of 100 MPG.
Pages
>>>>understood, but this is a viscious circle.
I am sorry about your husband being diabetic.
MONTANA MOM !
MONTANA MOM !
what is the correct number of people without insurance?
I would read up on vaccination were I you. Each vaccine is much less than 100% effective so if your child is round kids who are not vaccinated and they catch a disease, your child is at risk.
>>Sorry can't change my opinion<<
well, you can, but I understand it is unlikely you will.
Rose
We are close to 100 MPG...and none of these are little 1 or 2 seaters.
<>
No, I don't.
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure
>>I am sorry about your husband being diabetic. My uncle was also diabetic, he also had cancer. We lost him this year. He however was able to find work with a company that did offer pre-existing condition insurance. I don't have an answer for you on this, because as I've stated before, we just have to try to find a good job with good insurance. I'm sorry, I just don't believe that our tax dollars should have to pay for everyone to have insurance.<<
Wow, so your answer really IS "sorry, but if you can't find an insurance which will accept preexisting conditions, you will simply have to die. You aren't my problem." Do you feel any compassion for anyone who is in circumstances through no fault of their own: the mentally ill, the chronically sick, victims of natural disasters, babies with cancer -- anyone?
I really do not comprehend how someone with your point of view defines "society".
I do appreciate your "sorry" though my husband no longer has Type 1 diabetes.
Rose
I think that the US automakers sat on their profits and their dividends and they complained (and still complain) that it is too expensive to invest in technology that will meet new cafe standards, not to mention meet goals of 100 MPG.
MONTANA MOM !
Pages