Palin's 17-year-old daughter pregnant

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-19-2003
Palin's 17-year-old daughter pregnant
606
Mon, 09-01-2008 - 12:49pm

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-11-2007
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 12:59pm

http://www.feministsforlife.org/news/ffl-member-sarah-palin-vp.htm


THe link aboves proves Palin's membership. FFL's goal is to make abortion illegal...sooooo...it stands to reason her membership is a reflection of that.

Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket
Photobucket
iVillage Member
Registered: 02-15-2008
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 1:00pm
Really it doesn't matter if anyone agrees with her choice as long as she and her family are happy with it! I am proud of her as a woman to advance it is exciting! But unfortunately she won't get my vote because she is on the wrong side of policies! She has choices and I believe that all women should make their own choices also! What I don't understand about the Republican party is that they are against government controlling your lives but yet they want to control the women's rights to choose! Palin believes in outlawing abortion! Now I personally would never think of doing it but I don't believe in taking that right away from someone else! She doesn't believe in sex education, but I think people have the right to choose whether they want their child to have that choice or not! I'm sorry Palin I do commend you that you want to break the glass ceiling but I really wish you were on the right side of policies! No one has the right to take away a woman's RIGHT TO CHOOSE!!!!



iVillage Member
Registered: 06-23-2008
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 1:13pm


Let's see, people are losing their homes because they're idiots for getting zero down, interest only loans, everyone knows that the bank would want a balloon payment eventually, or the homeowners should know that they have a time limit to

MONTANA MOM !

Avatar for thefalliblefiend
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-08-2003
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 1:14pm

'As I said, everyone claiming she wants to take away their "right to choose" needs to put up proof or shut up. She has as much right to be pro-life and you do to be pro-choice unless you think its agree with you or the highway.'

Put up or shut up about what? Are you saying that she is not attempting to mandate her own religious convictions by denying women the legal right to choose? If that's true, I would be elated to read of it.

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-23-2008
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 1:17pm

MONTANA MOM !

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-07-2003
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 1:22pm

Knjess.


I guess you are proving why Montana ia a "red" state rather than a Blue one.

iVillage Member
Registered: 09-11-2007
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 1:22pm
Photobucket
iVillage Member
Registered: 06-23-2008
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 1:26pm

MONTANA MOM !

iVillage Member
Registered: 06-23-2008
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 1:33pm

point taken.

MONTANA MOM !

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-07-2003
Wed, 09-03-2008 - 1:38pm

The problem is not necessarily the politicians who are right to life or right to choice. The more you have of one issue in government the more of a chance that issue will be voted on in the way of the belief system you have. If you all agree that abortion is wrong you will all vote abortion is wrong. If the person signing the bill agrees that abortion is wrong the bill will be signed. If the person feels the right to choose is fine the bill will be vetoed.


Same sense. The person who belive abortion is wrong will appoint people to the Supreme Court

Pages