This poster stated previously that he/she believes that if the mother's life is in danger she should have a choice about abortion. As he/she allows that choice, apparently he/she feels he/she is "pro-choice" and saying otherwise is misrepresenting the position.
"Don't tell anyone but our tax dollars already support women and children and many, many different social programs."
True. I'm wondering what FFL specifically does in pursuit of their mission statement. It seems like a reasonably straight-forward question.
"The rest of that post is such a convoluted attempt to continue these unsubstantiated claims that I'm not even going to go there." I understand the Internet is very confusing to the uninitiated. You see, unknown to many people, Google actually stores the contents of web-pages, if they've been up long enough.
Eagle Forum Alaska is, according to their website, a "Pro-Family Group." According to the google cache, their own web-pages which have since been deleted, report that they sent a questionnaire to all the candidates for Governor in 2006 and posted the results on their website. The results included unequivocal responses by Palin on a number of subjects, including abortion.
The logic is not convoluted at all. Instead, it's clear and straight-forward. I even mentioned a few possible sources for error, including the possibility that hackers have snuck all this in to mislead people, or even that Eagle Forum's post is a fabrication. There are a few others, mostly involving hacking at other points.
While the logic is clear for those who actually understand logic, the point is moot. I suspect the cache will time-out eventually and there will be no breadcrumbs, unless, of course, there are other caches.
Pages
There is probably a debate team somewhere who would love to continue going around and around with all of this, but my point is simple.
There have been claims made that Palin will try to remove the "right to choose" simply because she does not agree with it.
I don't think anyone said anything about approaching pregnant teens on the street.
This poster stated previously that he/she believes that if the mother's life is in danger she should have a choice about abortion. As he/she allows that choice, apparently he/she feels he/she is "pro-choice" and saying otherwise is misrepresenting the position.
Rose
"Don't tell anyone but our tax dollars already support women and children and many, many different social programs."
True. I'm wondering what FFL specifically does in pursuit of their mission statement. It seems like a reasonably straight-forward question.
"The rest of that post is such a convoluted attempt to continue these unsubstantiated claims that I'm not even going to go there."
I understand the Internet is very confusing to the uninitiated. You see, unknown to many people, Google actually stores the contents of web-pages, if they've been up long enough.
Eagle Forum Alaska is, according to their website, a "Pro-Family Group." According to the google cache, their own web-pages which have since been deleted, report that they sent a questionnaire to all the candidates for Governor in 2006 and posted the results on their website. The results included unequivocal responses by Palin on a number of subjects, including abortion.
The logic is not convoluted at all. Instead, it's clear and straight-forward. I even mentioned a few possible sources for error, including the possibility that hackers have snuck all this in to mislead people, or even that Eagle Forum's post is a fabrication. There are a few others, mostly involving hacking at other points.
Here's a note on google caching:
http://www.googleguide.com/cached_pages.html
Here's where you can do reverse dns to see this is an authentic google page:
http://remote.12dt.com/ Just plug in: 209.85.215.104
Again, the direct link is:
http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:Lh8LX8KyM6sJ:eagleforumalaska.blogspot.com/2006/07/2006-gubernatorial-candidate.html+sarah+palin+eagle+forum&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us&client=firefox-a
While the logic is clear for those who actually understand logic, the point is moot. I suspect the cache will time-out eventually and there will be no breadcrumbs, unless, of course, there are other caches.
<
That kind of answer is precisely what bothers me about Obama.
<
Pages