What is an illegitimate rape? This is jaw-droppingly ignorant.
He said a stupid thing, and he's clarified it. If he can still win, he should stay in. He won the nomination. But please, don't get out because a bunch of hippocrates on the left are calling for it.
These are the people that have an accused rapist, impeached president, abuser of women, admitted liar as their keynote speaker. Akin hasn't done anything like that guy.
"Resist, we much. Weï»¿ must, and we much. About that, be committed."
What is really frightening is the fact that a poll shows he is still leading today in Missouri. That gives validity to the following CNN piece that it is not just Akin's viewpoint. Seriously, women, how can you support a candidate who believes there is such thing as legitimate or non-forcible rape?
The democrats of Missouri knew he was an idiot so of course they supported the weakest opponent of McCaskill. If you know that they supported him by their vote, please show me the proof of that.
Anthony, I agree with you that since he was elected he should stay in the race. But here in Missouri a vote does not mean much. The conceal carry and puppy mill laws were reversed by the republican powers to be in Missouri. Apparently they did not feel that Missourians got it right or did not understand the law so they simply overturned popular vote.
And they wonder why there voter apathy.
If the Democrats gave him support, it's because they wanted this bozo to run against McCaskill. It's like I rooted for Sharron Angle to become the GOP candidate because I knew she had no chance in hell of beating Harry Reid. Even Republicans weren't voting for her.
I was reading Google News this morning and happened to click on an NBC piece which featured the clip of Todd Akin's now-infamous comments on the Jaco Report. So far most of the blowback has been over his use of the "legitimate rape" phrase.
I was equally offended by his suggestion that the rapist should be punished and "not attacking the child". Nowhere in his response was any sense of how a raped women would feel about being forced to bear (and being daily reminded during her pregnancy) a "child" of force and violence. IOW, the woman is secondary, maybe even tertiary. She's just a vessel. Gaaack.
I've also been thinking about war rape:
Gita Sahgal, of Amnesty International, told the BBC News website it was a mistake to think such assaults were primarily about the age-old "spoils of war", or sexual gratification.
Rape is often used in ethnic conflicts as a way for attackers to perpetuate their social control and redraw ethnic boundaries, she said.
"Women are seen as the reproducers and carers of the community," she said.
"Therefore if one group wants to control another they often do it by impregnating women of the other community because they see it as a way of destroying the opposing community."
A report by Medecins Sans Frontieres says it first came across rape as a weapon in the 1990s.
"In Bosnia systematic rape was used as part of the strategy of ethnic cleansing," it said.
"Women were raped so they could give birth to a Serbian baby." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4078677.stm
If any of the sexist idiots who've been promulgating or defending the stupidity that a woman's body is able to somehow fight off an rape-caused pregnancy, maybe they should address the fact that the use of rape as a strategy to effect ethnic change seems to be getting more widespread and clearly illustrates that the "female body defense mechanism" bloody does NOT work!
If he thinks that the female body can stop a rape pregnancy, how does he explain why so many woman are having trouble having children. If we have such control over our bodies.. just saying. Do we really need birth control since we can "decide" to eliminate sperm from our bodies?
I guess Mr. Todd never took a basic biology course.
Oh yes.. This is a common tactic of terror and subjugation. Destroy a people via the "belly". It is also not only a method of ethnic cleansing but an attempt to destroy the woman's place in her community. In many traditional communities,a woman must be a (or at least appear to be) a virgin when she marries. Her virtue is precious to her. A few years ago, a young female foreign grad school was attacked at one of the local universities, while she worked late in the lab one night. The media and the university kept her identity and the details of the crime a secret because of the social stigma this poor girl would face back home, if it became common knowledge. She was worried that no man back home would ever want to marry her.
I find it offensive that a man who is making decisions about women's right to chose does not understand basic science. He is basically saying that if you got pregnant after a rape, then it must not have really been a rape becuase your body should take care of preventing a pregnancy. Basically if you got pregnant, it must have been consensual. Maybe his intent was not to demean, but the reality is that he did insult real victims out there.
The other implication of language being used by some GOP about "forcible rape" if that if you were rape you have to somehow prove it. This basically will make it more difficult for women in this situation to terminate thier pregnancies.
I think this decision is between a woman and her doctor. Lawmakers should not be involved, but obviously they don't trust women to have basic rights over their bodies. I can't think of a bigger violation of civil rights than having the government tell you whether you should carry a pregnancy for any reason.