because earlier (post # 536) you said that Obama's plan would create a surplus and JM's would create a defecit...i was showing that you are incorrect because they will both create a defecit. (which i suppose you also acknowledge?)
"sarcasim is a wonder thing;) It's me and these are things that have been said to me by someone(don't want to get Tos) on this board. It was a warning thats all :) Jamman knows I love and respect her a ton. "
LOL, that other post took me a second, but then I got it - absolutely no offense taken over here sweetie!
"exactly my point...they are equal in that regard.
because earlier (post # 536) you said that Obama's plan would create a surplus and JM's would create a defecit...i was showing that you are incorrect because they will both create a defecit. (which i suppose you also acknowledge?)"
I was merely trying to give someone the benefit of the doubt, that maybe what she said wasn't quite what she meant - not taking into account what the candidates are already starting with.
i can see that, i am just saying that it was pretty clear what she said, so your "inturpretation" is way off, so i suggested you go back and read it, rather than spend any more time trying to cover up an inaccuracy
Pages
exactly my point...they are equal in that regard.
because earlier (post # 536) you said that Obama's plan would create a surplus and JM's would create a defecit...i was showing that you are incorrect because they will both create a defecit. (which i suppose you also acknowledge?)
-Kristen
McCain was supporting a seperate bill to revise the GI bill and increase benefits to veterans, actually.
<>
where did McCain say schools were unecessary?
-Kristen
sarcasim is a wonder thing;)
someone recently told me that i wasn't allowed to be sarcastic on this thread...that it is a violation of TOS.
Thanks Court! for the sig!
-Kristen
"sarcasim is a wonder thing;) It's me and these are things that have been said to me by someone(don't want to get Tos) on this board. It was a warning thats all :) Jamman knows I love and respect her a ton. "
LOL, that other post took me a second, but then I got it - absolutely no offense taken over here sweetie!
"exactly my point...they are equal in that regard.
because earlier (post # 536) you said that Obama's plan would create a surplus and JM's would create a defecit...i was showing that you are incorrect because they will both create a defecit. (which i suppose you also acknowledge?)"
Both candidates would have us running a deficit.
<
-Kristen
I was merely trying to give someone the benefit of the doubt, that maybe what she said wasn't quite what she meant - not taking into account what the candidates are already starting with.
Thanks Court! for the sig!
-Kristen
"rather than spend any more time trying to cover up an inaccuracy"
I wasn't trying to cover anything up, this isn't some conspiracy - I was just offering a thought.
Pages