Santorum would target porn if elected

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2011
Santorum would target porn if elected
86
Fri, 03-16-2012 - 11:58am

Pages

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-03-2011
Sat, 03-17-2012 - 3:41pm
Well, he stole money from one state to have his children enrolled in a homeschooling program that he refuses to pay back. His wife had an abortion.
iVillage Member
Registered: 05-28-2011
Sat, 03-17-2012 - 4:38pm

Sanctomonius Santorum needs to go back and read his Bible.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-02-2009
Sat, 03-17-2012 - 5:33pm
nellewrites wrote:

Because the man espouses hate. Everything he says is hate filled bigotry. To denounce bigotry is not bigoted, although the right loves to claim it is. It's self defence.

This man is a hypocrite, who likes to claim he's religious but acts opposite what most all religions advocate.

I'd have to disagree with all of that. He's not hateful, does not espouse hate, and would be a great President, leaps and bounds ahead of what we have now. Is he perfect? Of course not.

"Resist, we much. We must, and we much. About that, be committed."

iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2006
Sat, 03-17-2012 - 8:15pm
Santorum hates a lot of people...payback time?
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2006
Sat, 03-17-2012 - 8:17pm
Yeah, he'd be a great president all right...for everybody who's just like he is. For the other 99%...not so good.
iVillage Member
Registered: 05-28-2011
Sat, 03-17-2012 - 11:15pm

I for one have not heard him mention men that abandon their families or those that knock up women leave them high and dry.

iVillage Member
Registered: 03-02-2009
Sun, 03-18-2012 - 12:34am

Even if that silliness were true, he'd still be light years better than what we are stuck with now.

"Resist, we much. We must, and we much. About that, be committed."

iVillage Member
Registered: 05-03-2011
Sun, 03-18-2012 - 9:52am
I have no desire to live under Talibangelical rules.
iVillage Member
Registered: 04-09-2006
Sun, 03-18-2012 - 9:45pm
"Even if that silliness were true, he'd still be light years better than what we are stuck with now."

Silliness? That's a weird way to refer to access to contraception. And "what we are stuck with now" is not limiting access to women's healthcare, so your statement is false...especially the "light years" part...Santorum doesn't understand science and was the cool dude who tried to attach the teaching of "Intelligent Design" to the 2001 No Child Left Behind bill.
iVillage Member
Registered: 03-02-2009
Sun, 03-18-2012 - 10:44pm
muddymessalonskee wrote:

Silliness? That's a weird way to refer to access to contraception. And "what we are stuck with now" is not limiting access to women's healthcare...

I wasn't refering to contraception. And what we are stuck with now, is Obama.

"Resist, we much. We must, and we much. About that, be committed."

Pages