So this is 51% of our country, how sad
Find a Conversation
So this is 51% of our country, how sad
| Tue, 11-11-2008 - 10:16am |
A video showing just what we've been saying.
| Tue, 11-11-2008 - 10:16am |
A video showing just what we've been saying.
Pages
Of course I have seen drug dealers and prostitutes. Like I said, I live in Seattle. I work downtown and I walk there every day. However I fail to see how prostitutes and drug dealers are an example of welfare abuse.
If you are concerned about the cost to taxpayers then I would think you would be pushing to legalize drugs and prostitution, since the biggest cost to society from these professions is coming from arresting, trying, and jailing these people.
I know people who get assistance and none of them are IMO abusing it. I know homeless people and none of them get into a car at the end of the day. They sleep on the sidewalks in doorways, or on the buses that run all night to Sea-Tac airport, or in a tent in a church parking lot. Or if they are lucky enough they can pay for a thin mat inside a filthy bug infested "shelter". Some of them are are so mentally ill they can't even begin to fend for themselves.
My Kiddo :)
Create your own family sticker graphic at pYzam.com
Benefits are income and dependent based. It doesn't matter if you have a car payment or not. You will not get more because you have a car payment, a cell phone, cable,
<>
Both.
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure
Another empty, unfounded rationalization.
ok, i see your excuses why it wouldn't work, but i think we will just have to dissagree....because i still think it wuold help enough people to make it worth it.
I feel that there are enough people who don't manage the money that they do have in a way that will help them in the long run, this leaves them more dependant on the public for longer...
educational materials could be printed and sent out, or on-line since no one agrees that internet is a luxury, if the public is going to help fund these people who have the internet, might as well take advantage of it.
but we can just dissagree...
-Kristen
Ok, I think, I see what you are saying, but that is a case of assuming that all people on welfare get all of those things.
<>
I like to think of them as reasons not excuses.
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure
Pages