i didn't say they wouldn't benefit...i think we all benefit (by not facing a collapse of the banks)
what i was saying was.....you can't say that everyone in the top 5% is bankers....so you can't say they are at fault, and we saved them BECAUSE they are bankers...and you can not say that they benefit because they are bankers.....they are not all bankers.
Pages
<>
No one has ever suggested it is government's job to make decisions for us.
<>
but that is what SS is, it is the govt taking our money, saving it, and returning it (at a lower value)
<>
some people (myself included) think that SS was designed to force people (everyone) to save for retirement, not to protect lower income people.
-Kristen
oh boy, we are really splitting hairs here...
i didn't say they wouldn't benefit...i think we all benefit (by not facing a collapse of the banks)
what i was saying was.....you can't say that everyone in the top 5% is bankers....so you can't say they are at fault, and we saved them BECAUSE they are bankers...and you can not say that they benefit because they are bankers.....they are not all bankers.
-Kristen
I agree with you somewhat that if you never put in, you shouldn't get the bulk of the benefit.
<>
I am not sure where I said I was concerned about lower wage earners not investing in private funds.
<>
It is designed to help the lower income ranges.
<>
I never did.
i'll try to answer some...
-Kristen
Pages