We obviously disagree. I don't understand the logical of 'if a criminal can get it I should get it too'. There are societies where the cops walking the beat don't even carry weapons. Where very few people are killed by guns and where even the criminals have an extremely hard time getting them.
A 5-4 win on a narrowly defined decision like this one, one that left open lots and lots and lots of questions about gun regulation means that there is a very good chance that the same court, looking a other gun cases, might rule in other directions.
So when you said >>What do you mean? A 'win' is a win as far as I'm concerned. Doesn't matter what the score was.<<
You really already knew what she meant and you really do already understand that it does matter what the score is. Well, full marks for consistency I guess.
We obviously disagree. I don't understand the logical of 'if a criminal can get it I should get it too'. There are societies where the cops walking the beat don't even carry weapons. Where very few people are killed by guns and where even the criminals have an extremely hard time getting them
Yes I suppose we'd have to disagree on this one.
I don't think anyone needs to be a sitting duck or a target without any means to defend themselves. There's
Pages
A 5-4 win on a narrowly defined decision like this one, one that left open lots and lots and lots of questions about gun regulation means that there is a very good chance that the same court, looking a other gun cases, might rule in other directions.
<>
They certainly will, if contracted to.
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure
So when you said >>What do you mean? A 'win' is a win as far as I'm concerned. Doesn't matter what the score was.<<
You really already knew what she meant and you really do already understand that it does matter what the score is. Well, full marks for consistency I guess.
Rose
What do you mean? A 'win' is a win as far as I'm concerned. Doesn't matter what the score was
With a Democratic Congress and President possibly taking over.. I'd be concerned is all I'm saying. Can this ever be revisited?
We obviously disagree. I don't understand the logical of 'if a criminal can get it I should get it too'. There are societies where the cops walking the beat don't even carry weapons. Where very few people are killed by guns and where even the criminals have an extremely hard time getting them
Yes I suppose we'd have to disagree on this one.
I don't think anyone needs to be a sitting duck or a target without any means to defend themselves. There's
Pages