<>
Not with
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure
>>If your government went awol could you protect your home? your country?<<
Nope, and neither could you, particularly with a handgun which WAS the type of gun in this ruling.
Rose --
Jinx, joke, owe me a coke!
>>>Nope, and neither could you, particularly with a handgun which WAS the type of gun in this ruling.<<<
How very wrong you are...you most certainly COULD protect yourself. Well, you couldn't. You wouldn't have
See
If your government went meter could you protect your home? your country?
>>>You get rights but what about our rights?<<<
Well you'd have to talk to the fellas that wrote that there 2nd Amendment...and oh...I guess that's not gonna happen.
Pages
<>
Not with
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure
>>If your government went awol could you protect your home? your country?<<
Nope, and neither could you, particularly with a handgun which WAS the type of gun in this ruling.
Rose --
<>
Jinx, joke, owe me a coke!
I disagree with you, but I'm pretty sure
>>>Nope, and neither could you, particularly with a handgun which WAS the type of gun in this ruling.<<<
How very wrong you are...you most certainly COULD protect yourself. Well, you couldn't. You wouldn't have
See
If your government went meter could you protect your home? your country?
>>>You get rights but what about our rights?<<<
Well you'd have to talk to the fellas that wrote that there 2nd Amendment...and oh...I guess that's not gonna happen.
Pages