The "cost of working"
Find a Conversation
| Thu, 03-15-2007 - 2:08pm |
I have been reading a lot of articles on this issue which claim that the cost of working is not worth your salary. One article claimed that it isn't worth it for a mom to work unless she is making at least 70K a year.
I don't see it at all. They cite things like work clothing, lunches out (instead of making your own at home), and gas.
The way I see it, gas money is always something you are going to need. When I wasn't working, I always went out and did things to combat boredom. Not only that, but there were errands to run. And if I did stay home with my children, I don't think I'd just want them at home with me all day just so I can save on gas (or just taking them along on errands). I'd want to take them fun places and do fun things. I would need gas to do that.
Work clothing is a null issue for me. We have to wear polo shirts with our logo and black or khaki pants. Pants I have always gotten at thrift stores. The company gives us the shirts, and if we want more than they give us, the shirts are $18. (Big deal).
As far as lunches go, I bring my lunch not to save money, but because our cafe is horrid and there isn't anywhere to really drive to on our lunch breaks. I only eat in the cafe on break if it's an emergency. I don't even like walking past it because of the smell.
It just doesn't seem to me like the "cost of working is not worth my salary" thing will really fly in my own life. I already know that I make more than the cost of daycare, anyway. I would only be breaking even there if I had three or four kids.
Does anyone else just not know where people get these equations?

Pages
Well then I guess I was confused by the first part of the statement where you talked about averaging the time over 18 years in that one didn't give up anything by woh?
PumpkinAngel
I
PumpkinAngel
I wonder if that is less of a concern here (Canada), where maternity and parental leaves can equal an entire year? I have not heard stats that support a significant decrease in the hiring of women since these long mat leaves were introduced.
I also think that these comments might exist more in engineering or other traditionally male occupations.
Carrie
Im curious what is so negative about being a accessory to your dh's success. You know what they say behind every successful man is a women. ;)
I did not give up my career for dh to shine at work. He was perfectly capable of doing that on his own. I quit my job b/c we wanted to get married and have children he was offered a very high paying demanding position that would not be possible with a working spouse with young children, it made our lives easier all the way around with much less stress by my sah so we could live seasonlly and travel with dh. Im thrilled i did, the education and culture my children have recieved is pricless. He now has accomplished his goals in his career and has ventured out on his own.
I went on to recieve a higher education to study other things and travel the world with my family that we would have not been able to do had i worked out of the home.
The choice we made was healthy for us.
Edited 3/22/2007 3:37 pm ET by xenozany
"In fact, most people make career choices that cost them far more than that. A cost is only "too high" to the extent that it is "too high" for a particular individual or family."
And this is exactly right.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Pages