It doesn't irk me, it just isn't the issue at hand. The "selfish" issue has been explained and rehashed ad nauseam and was not what you claimed got you all confused so that you misplaced your 100%.
You are apparently intent on avoiding a very simple question, which is too bad.
knowing my child I would hazard a guess that nearly every bad day her child care providers had was causally linked to bad days LIZA was having....god that child is hell in a handbasket when she wants to be...
Pages
No fear.
"
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Well, I hate to dwell on getting a retracing of the history of this thread down accurately since it seems to irk you.
It doesn't irk me, it just isn't the issue at hand. The "selfish" issue has been explained and rehashed ad nauseam and was not what you claimed got you all confused so that you misplaced your 100%.
You are apparently intent on avoiding a very simple question, which is too bad.
Who claims that?
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
knowing my child I would hazard a guess that nearly every bad day her child care providers had was causally linked to bad days LIZA was having....god that child is hell in a handbasket when she wants to be...
Yes. We. Did.
So you think if I had needed to WOH, I still would have quit to SAH?
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Pages