Divorce rulings on SAHM's alimony?
Find a Conversation
Divorce rulings on SAHM's alimony?
| Thu, 04-29-2004 - 10:29pm |
I have seen this many times, and I am wondering what your guys' opinion on this. Of course with divorce rates so high we find couples with children in court all the time finding out what is entitled to mothers for alimony. The argument is, should SAHM's receive more alimony then WOHM's? This meaning SAHM's who have through the whole marriage stayed at home with the children while the fathers successeds in their careers. This also meaning if they are going to pursue a career after the fact is their income be significant enough compared to the EX since they have been out of the work force for years and has not gained experience in what ever career the would have pursued.
I personally know someone who went through the exsact same thing and had a hard time finding a job(with income compareable) after the divorse since she hadn't worked for 25yrs.
The question also arise, does the SAHM contribute to the Fathers success because they choose to stay home therefore they should receive a cut now that they are divorced (the same as many would if they were still married)?
Thoughts? Please state weather you are a SAHM or WOHM when you place your comments

Pages
BTW, FTR, I've seen a few posts about dads choosing not to take their kids. If dad could improve his kids lifestyle by taking custody and refuses to do so, I, personally, think he morally obligates himeself to increase their standard of living but he still doesn't owe anything to their mother. He does owe it to his kids to provide for them well. If he's not willing to do that himself, then he should ante up. Unfortunately, few men do. I've only ever known one who did but that one is the most amicable joint custody arrangement I have ever seen. Makes you wonder why they ever got divorced.
Hollie
http://attach.prospero.com/n/docs/docDownload.aspx?guid=7E117344-D332-46AD-A2B2-30B19FAEACCF&webtag=iv-pssahwoh
Choose your friends by their character and your socks by their color. Choosing your socks by their character makes no sense and choosing your friends by their color is unthinkable.
Yes it is how CS works. If my income increases, and xh's remains the same, the CS he pays me decreases. If his income increases and mine doesn't, his CS increases.
Our CS arrangement is reviewed every 24 months. We both show proof of income and the CS obligation of both parents is adjusted accordingly.
Hollie
http://attach.prospero.com/n/docs/docDownload.aspx?guid=7E117344-D332-46AD-A2B2-30B19FAEACCF&webtag=iv-pssahwoh
Choose your friends by their character and your socks by their color. Choosing your socks by their character makes no sense and choosing your friends by their color is unthinkable.
If you'll note, my scenarios had SQUAT to do with custody. It doesn't matter who has the kids. Alimony is a separate thing.
And, once again, dad is not SUPPORTING mom. You're the only one contending that.
Hollie
http://attach.prospero.com/n/docs/docDownload.aspx?guid=7E117344-D332-46AD-A2B2-30B19FAEACCF&webtag=iv-pssahwoh
Choose your friends by their character and your socks by their color. Choosing your socks by their character makes no sense and choosing your friends by their color is unthinkable.
yes!
Choose your friends by their character and your socks by their color. Choosing your socks by their character makes no sense and choosing your friends by their color is unthinkable.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Pages