Full-time Nanny with SAHP - Why?
Find a Conversation
Full-time Nanny with SAHP - Why?
| Tue, 02-10-2004 - 6:41pm |
Something I've often wondered about, but never had the opportunity to ask. Why do SAHM or SAHD need a full time nanny, especially when they aren't working from home. I can easily see the need if the SAHP is a WAHP, but what is the logic for a full time nanny otherwise?
Any comments?

Pages
There's a reason Mother Theresa was able to give so much..she didn't have her own family to take care of!
But honestly, if Mrs. Gates does leave the kids for 40 hours a week, especially since she does not have to, yeah, I wouldn't nominate her for mother of the year award, that's for sure.
Princess Diana was always involved with volunteer causes, even when her boys were younger. As Princess she had her official royal duties plus those volunteer causes she took on. She did insist that the boys travel with her and Charles when they were younger, much to the consernation of the Royal Palace. But they were with the nanny when she and Charles were doing the "royal" thing, whether that was in England or Austrialia.
outside_the_box_mom
You do~
How exactly is leaving your child in care for 40 hours a week to go to work any different than leaving your child in care for 40 hours a week to volunteer? Money! so if one makes money it is all good "A-okay"
Because they don't want to clean. What did you think I was going to say?
Feel free to disagree, but this discussions pretty well played out, you came too late.
Pages