How does this relate to the debate?
Find a Conversation
| Wed, 08-20-2003 - 7:56pm |
Something occurred to me earlier and I wanted to see how others thought it might relate to the whole "which is harder SAH/WOH" portion of the debate that crops up so often.
I think that, when you look at either group *as a whole*, the WOHs might have it harder. And this is why ...
There are virtually no SAHMs who SAH because they "have to". There are virtually no SAHMs who are forced to SAH. A woman that SAH wants to SAH.(I'm sure there's a few exceptions out there; controlling dhs who MAKE their wives SAH, disabled children, etc) A woman that SAH doesn't hate her "job", or else she'd go get a WOH job. A woman that SAH is generally getting what she wants.
There are LOTS AND LOTS of WOHMs who WOH because they "have to". A single mom, or one whose dh doesn't make enough to support the family, or one with a disabled dh, whatever the case may be ... she may long, with all her heart, to SAH, but *can't*. Many WOHMs hate their jobs, but can't quit.
Anyhoo ... just wanted to stir up something new
Hollie

Pages
Of course, that would make me partly wrong, because I think that girl was 13 or something.
However, if you look through her posts and ignore some of the spew, you will notice that she can spell perfectly fine. It seems like someone is taking an awful lot of effort to make the spelling mistakes on purpose.
And, it reminds of another poster on one of the boards as well. But I can't remember where..the whole posting style is very similar and since we are all on multiple boards, it could be from anywhere. Almost like that borg who kept it up on either HT or MD, but kept using different screen names.
btw so i dont have to repeat myself, no one has disagreed with my positions of the debate TOPIC, just misrepresented my words to make their point, or to debate who Iam to you. It is histaricle but i admit we are somewhat creeped out at how much time I take up in your thoughts. Perhaps in time that wont be a issue anylonger. I will pass my concerns on...
unity^
Sorry to disappoint you...
Hear they be good fer whats ever ailing yer tummy.
--Or if you had a basic understanding of how to navigate the boards you would have understood.-- Like i said you SEEM to have a problem with the way i navigate the board.
Oops maybe she meant it is so much easier and more natural for HER or HER child to take breastmilk from a breast. Maybe it is so much more natural for HER and/or HER child to do this.
I personally don't know why anyone would care how I deliver nourishment to my child. More specifically I don't know why anyone would presume to make claims to some kind of natural superiority without knowing the nature of the child/relationship. Whooppee for you, your breasts flowed freely - well I nursed 24/7, ate oatmeal, drank the tea, pumped, nursed, pumped some more, nursed some more, took vitamins, relaxed, played soft music, changed positions, consulted a nurse and the bottle flowed more freely than my breasts ever did. Thankfully there was a period that I was on a roll and was able to freeze a fair amount and gave that to my child in a cup/bottle. That was what was natural for us, but by the insta-assumptions made by some here, that certainly wouldn't be the thought process if you encountered us in public (although I should embrace their every parenting choice because it is the natural one.)
Also, I didn't ask about the difference between cow's milk and breastmilk, I am aware. I was asking about the health/ortho issues regarding sucking things (no delicate way to put that- sorry). Why is it so important to wean from a x,y or z, but an any-time accessible breast is okay?
SUS
unity^
Edited 8/28/2003 8:27:24 PM ET by silverunity
Have you noticed how this poster will joke around with some and go after others?
Pages