If you hadn't had kids...
Find a Conversation
If you hadn't had kids...
| Thu, 05-20-2004 - 10:34pm |
And your dh made enough $$ to support both of you comfortably, do you think you would be working?
| Thu, 05-20-2004 - 10:34pm |
Pages
Gee, it just so happens that I can raise my kids, put their NEEDS first AND enjoy myself along the way.
Utterly, totally ridiculous.
eileen
I'll keep my three wonderful kids. I imagine they look nor act any different than your one child.
ROFLOL.
eileen
sounds like plain old parenting to me, LOL.and done by just about EVERY good parent.
eileen
Correction: *Infants* and *young children* DON'T *need* to be in *substitute care*, ADULTS/PARENTS *need* infants and young children to be in *substitute care*. BTW, your the one who uses/used substitute care for 50+ hours per week year round right? Is this truely for THEIR benefit, or YOURS?
eileen
<>
More laughter that you do not do...hmm.
PumpkinAngel
PumpkinAngel
Of course, that's specifically why we homeschool! BTW, I don't use a substitute to educate my child, I'm a former teacher remember? Actually, she goes to school primarily for socialization experiences, not to receive caregiving or an education from a substitute. Haven't we already had this debate?
"Oh that's right, no one cares for your dd during those 7.5 hours during the day."
She goes to school from 9-3. That's 6 hours, not 7.5 hours, and no school isn't substitute care.
Yes, of course it's a BIGGIE for MOTHER/CHILD bonding and attachment. Did I say that MOTHER'S and FATHER'S bonding experiences are the SAME? WHERE???
Pages