If you hadn't had kids...
Find a Conversation
If you hadn't had kids...
| Thu, 05-20-2004 - 10:34pm |
And your dh made enough $$ to support both of you comfortably, do you think you would be working?
| Thu, 05-20-2004 - 10:34pm |
Pages
I understand the anonymity of this forum foments incivility, but it's a real shame you felt you had to make up something like that.
I expected H&IM and ECSM to be offensive, but not you! You usually contribute meaningfully to the discussions here. You had a bad day and weren't yourself when you personally attacked me and K88 below. All is forgotten.
You admitted that you did not contribute even a scintilla of substance to the political First Ladies debate that had been going on for days. I called you on it and now you're obsessed with ME!
Do yourself a favor. When the frog and toad (apparently there's a difference between the 2!) exhibit comes to the Natural History Museum in a city near you - go. Spend the day with your family. Then have lunch, shop at Henri Bendel's and Bergdorf Goodmans, if you are so fortunate to have them. We did yesterday, and it puts in perspective how much you are overreacting here. That's my final word. YOu can continue trying to pick me apart here and I have no doubt you shall succeed! But I'm moving on to other discussions.
Please point out where:
1.
PumpkinAngel
<<Stop following me around the board just because I pointed out in the First Ladies debate that the only reason you posted was to attack me and Kerry88. Stop wasting your time composing a litany of questions for me to answer so that you can make yourself feel less superficial. >>
Following you around?
PumpkinAngel
I'm acting as an arbitrator? HA! Think not.
The Presidents/First Ladies debate really doesn't apply here. What applies here is that you have been insulting since just about your first post here and don't seem to care. Which is what I was pointing out. That since you don't seem to care about being insulting, telling you that you are does no one any good. By not being told you're being insulting, it doesn't mean that you're not being insulting.
Hollie
http://attach.prospero.com/n/docs/docDownload.aspx?guid=7E117344-D332-46AD-A2B2-30B19FAEACCF&webtag=iv-pssahwoh
Choose your friends by their character and your socks by their color. Choosing your socks by their character makes no sense and choosing your friends by their color is unthinkable.
ironically, it must be you because NO ONE else on this board -- save a few outrageous militants -- would characterize any of our (H&IM and me) to be offensive. not surprisingly, i can't say the same about your posts.
point proven. thanks for yet again showing how you're "not" insulting. UGH.
eileen
Please give it up already and STOP mentioning me in any further posts. It's annoying and your "charges" are completely WITHOUT foundation or any merit.
PLEASE STOP maligning me. It really reflects rather badly on you.
eileen
My apologies if i'm in error, but i am in NO WAY "making anything up". that wouldn't even be worth my time.
instead of dealing with incivility -- why not just write in a way that is NOT insulting, NOT offensive, NOT rude -- without having to be called on it?
Eileen
eileen
Pages